Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think the law needs to change on 4x4s and Supersized SUVs in Cities.

551 replies

JustMint · 06/07/2023 16:50

Unsure how, but today's news is just horrifying, these vehicles really need to be reduced in numbers in residential areas in my opinion. They are significantly heavier than smaller cars (I know that's stating the obvious) but who really needs a 4X4 in a city?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Zepherine · 06/07/2023 18:07

Frabbits · 06/07/2023 17:21

My electric city car weighs more than my SUV.

So... yeah. Not really thought this one through, have you?

It’s also the height of the bonnet, as a previous poster has said. Lots of SUVs around here, in zone 2 in London. They look ridiculous for the size of the streets and are intimidating to pedestrians. No-one needs one in London or to bring one in either. Lots of alternatives to getting into this city and around it.

Curiouscarla · 06/07/2023 18:08

I don't have all the answers it is merely a case of mulling possible scenarios.
What I do know for a fact is that many drivers of these vehicles do not have the driving skills to cope when they need to act quickly in an emergency road situation.
They are perfectly safe 'inside' their vehicle which also adds to the general arrogance of the style of driving.

blackrabbitwhiterabbit · 06/07/2023 18:08

No normal family needs a 4x4. Gas guzzling & despicable monster trucks.

PurposefulBear · 06/07/2023 18:09

Curiouscarla · 06/07/2023 18:08

I don't have all the answers it is merely a case of mulling possible scenarios.
What I do know for a fact is that many drivers of these vehicles do not have the driving skills to cope when they need to act quickly in an emergency road situation.
They are perfectly safe 'inside' their vehicle which also adds to the general arrogance of the style of driving.

Please share your “facts” … what a load of BS. There are rubbish drivers everywhere

Lionoso · 06/07/2023 18:13

PurposefulBear · 06/07/2023 18:09

Please share your “facts” … what a load of BS. There are rubbish drivers everywhere

There is a massive difference between being hit by a "rubbish driver" in a ford fiesta, than there is being hit by a "rubbish driver" in a Range Rover.

Height, weight and stopping distance make is much less likely you would survive being hit by a Range Rover.

Curiouscarla · 06/07/2023 18:14

And let's not forget that the woman involved today, whether her fault or not has got to live with the fact that she has killed a child. And so has the child's family.
Why do you think so many road safety campaigners are usually grieving families.

SunshineShines · 06/07/2023 18:15

I look at my DD’s school car park. Estimate that 60-70% of the cara in there are huge 4x4s. Massive cars are a status symbol. You don’t need one if you are the standard family unit of 2 adults, 2 kids (or less). But people want them to keep up with the Joneses.

Fightyouforthatpie · 06/07/2023 18:15

JustMint · 06/07/2023 18:05

OK so a lot of people seem angry that I don’t know how to solve this - it’s out of my area of expertise but how about this…

Let’s use London (whoever compared London to the Welsh Valley’s is clearly missing the point) as the largest city and as an example.

Out of M25 / End of Public Transport Route parking facilities for free for large cars so people can travel in on PT.

Higher Tax for anyone who “needs” an SUV / 4X4 in London - if they can afford the car they can afford a whacking increase in tax, or they will have to think again about whether they really need the car. Tax should be on a percentage of income/savings rather than set amount - that way it impacts all in the same way.

Taxation money goes back into local infrastructure to fund educational campaigns and design infrastructure around high pedestrian / cyclist routes, particularly with young children footfall.

Policy changes so that schools encourage no cars on pick up and drop off, and policy changes that mean car manufacturers have to start improving car design for pedestrian safety ON PAR with the design for passenger safety.

Educate - advanced theory and driving courses for anyone driving a vehicle over a set weight, it’s clear from this thread people don’t understand car weight is a factor in car deaths (quite a terrifying lack of knowledge) and then probably don’t factor in breaking distances, kerb hop capabilities, and potential injuries from driving a heavier/larger car. This would include EVs as well.

Commendable.

I would probably go along with most of this, but there's not a snowball's chance in hell of it happening - massive costs aside, I can just imagine all the people in the towns alongside the M25 gathering their opposition the vast car parks.

Alos doubt it would deter many of the 4x4 drivers - they already pay a lot of road and fuel taxes as well as VAT etc so I imagine if they really are status symbols, the knowledge of just how much they cost will only make them more attractive, however the income could be useful.

After all these changes, would we be sure a Newish Land Rover Defender wouldn't kill or injure kids at a school? No. So would it be worth it?

NIGHTNAMECHANGE · 06/07/2023 18:16

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Theunamedcat · 06/07/2023 18:17

blackrabbitwhiterabbit · 06/07/2023 18:08

No normal family needs a 4x4. Gas guzzling & despicable monster trucks.

Define normal

Mushroo · 06/07/2023 18:17

All those saying you can do damage in any car - of course you can.

But if you could pick, you’d choose to take your chances with a fiat 500 over a Land Rover Defender wouldn’t you.

Ilovecaviar · 06/07/2023 18:18

You could be hit by a fast cyclist and die or be seriously injured. As sad as it is an out of control car whatever size will be dangerous. Not many car accidents involve ploughing into a crowd of people thankfully, they are rare.

Fightyouforthatpie · 06/07/2023 18:18

Lionoso · 06/07/2023 18:13

There is a massive difference between being hit by a "rubbish driver" in a ford fiesta, than there is being hit by a "rubbish driver" in a Range Rover.

Height, weight and stopping distance make is much less likely you would survive being hit by a Range Rover.

Stopping distances aren't much different now, tech has seen to that.
You're right about size, but only to a point. Sadly, you could be killed by either quite easily as a pedestrian, and being killed by a Fiesta wouldn't make you any less dead.

Alyso · 06/07/2023 18:19

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

BlanketSmoothies · 06/07/2023 18:19

Retrain12345 · 06/07/2023 16:56

They already are bringing in huge fines in the form of ULEZ which should reduce a few.

I have two big cars but I do need them
and won’t be persuaded to give them up for anything!

ULEZ has no bearing on this at all. Very few cars are not ULEZ compliant.

I completely agree with you OP. These cars have been shown time and again to be more dangerous to pedestrians than normally proportioned cars. They also cause more accidents on roads because people can’t see around them at junctions.

There is absolutely no excuse to drive a massive Land Rover in any part of London. I’ve been saying this for years.

pimplesquisher · 06/07/2023 18:19

JustMint · 06/07/2023 17:02

@Dartmoorcheffy can you show me research that says it wouldn't have made any difference? Because physics tells us otherwise - larger vehicles are more dangerous to people outside of the vehicle.

And nope, I wouldn't ban buses - though I do think their training needs to be seriously improved particularly in regards to cyclists. I would love to see lighter, and better designed buses though too. Buses are designed to carry many, many people - there's a need for them. There's very few people who need a 4X4 in London.

The majority of the population doesn't live in London

SnackSizeRaisin · 06/07/2023 18:19

BarelyLiterate · 06/07/2023 17:49

IF a child has tragically lost their life because some clueless idiot posh yummy mummy lost control of a large SUV which was too big & powerful for her to handle safely in an urban area, that should be a tipping point.

It would be very difficult to ban such vehicles, but imposing escalating taxes on such vehicles which apply to owners who cannot demonstrate a clear need for them would be highly effective. For example, annual road tax of £10k for a Range Rover or similar registered to an address inside the M25. The assumption being that nobody who lives in that region could possibly need a large SUV.

They will just register it to their second home

Justputitdown · 06/07/2023 18:20

KnitMePurlMe · 06/07/2023 17:47

Yes of course they need to be banned - I’m so fucking sick of all the excuses for people who “need” them. Very few people actually need them, they’re just wanky status symbols for pricks and driven terribly because people feel “safe” in them. Fuck the rest of us in our small cars who have to feel perpetually intimidated by them.

I fucking hate them.

This. I couldn't agree more. I hate them with a passion.

JustMint · 06/07/2023 18:20

People really need to remember the word likelihood, and the concept of statistics.

OP posts:
Justputitdown · 06/07/2023 18:20

NamelessNancy · 06/07/2023 17:55

Not sure what supermarket delivery vans have to do with it. They are appropriately sized for the job they do and their efficient use can keep many more vehicles off the road.

Seems to me like people will tangle themselves up in whataboutery to justify selfish choices.

Thank you! People saying bin lorries are just as dangerous are somewhat missing the entire point🙄

Bingbangbongbash · 06/07/2023 18:21

missmollygreen · 06/07/2023 17:00

The weight of the car has no bearing on how badly someone is injured by it if they get hit. You think the child wouldnt have died if it was a small car?

As sad as it is these sorts of accidents will happen, it is unavoidable.

NTFT but this is entirely incorrect.

Taller cars mean you are hit in a way that sends you under the wheels of the car, rather than over the bonnet. You are hit in softer, more important areas and injuries are worse & more likely to be deadly.

Heavier cars travelling at the same speed contain more energy (basic physics) and more of that energy will be absorbed by the objects they hit.

The most worrying thing facing the car safety industry at the moment is the increasing size and mass of cars. It’s especially problematic for electric cars because the batteries weigh so much.

All SUVs should be banned in cities and limited to those who need them for work purposes everywhere else.

Quveas · 06/07/2023 18:21

JustMint · 06/07/2023 16:56

Well, as someone who lives in London with no car (and manages just fine because I've adapted my lifestyle) I can assure you I am not driving any kind of SUV/4X4.

It's not about the footprint though - it's about size and weight and the danger to pedestrians, particularly children. Research shows smaller cars are safer to cyclists and pedestrians.

Oh fab. You live in pretty much the only place in the UK with a public transport system. So hard to adapt your lifestyle with public transport and no need for a bigger vehicle due to children or disability. I weep for you.

Alyso · 06/07/2023 18:21

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Whattheactualwhatnow · 06/07/2023 18:21

YANBU this was my first thought too OP

Alyso · 06/07/2023 18:23

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.