I chair the managing committee of a reasonably sized voluntary group. Traditionally the minutes of the AGM in one year are published with the notice of the AGM in the next year (so eg, minutes of AGM held in April 2021 were published in March 2022 with the notice of the April 2022 meeting). The secretary has drafted the minutes of the April 2023 AGM which have been sent to the committee for their review. So far so good.
Apparently I'm being controversial as I want to publish the April 2023 draft minutes to the registered members of the organisation before the end of June. Why? Because it makes it easier for people to recall what actually happened and make note of anything they want to raise at next year's meeting. It also means that members who weren't there won't have to wait a year to see what happened. The longer standing members of the committee think it's worked as is forever so why change it now. See also, it's not done anywhere else they know of so why would we do it. I'm trying to slowly and with consensus make changes to be a bit more open in how we present our work to members and I think this is an easy win. The minutes will not, of course, be ratified until the are proposed at the AGM next April.
So,
You are being reasonable: make the change, publish the minutes a whole 2 months after the meeting but 9 months earlier than ever before)
Or
You are not being unreasonable: Good god woman, it's a decades old tradition to not do it, what hornets' nest are you trying to stir up?