I think this is a little unfair.
finding out if a pet is insured helps broach the issue of referral costs and whether this is even an option for this client. Because clients love their animals it can be a very delicate conversation to feel a way through with them, what are they prepared to do, how much are they able to spend, without making it all about money or the client feeling that they are letting their animal down if they can’t afford gold standard medicine, almost everyone has a financial limit.
You do also occasionally meet people who don’t understand that all the money and super vets in the world can’t save their pet or turn the clock back on ageing. There are also people who want everything done, declare money is no object, with absolutely no intention of paying a penny, running up debt in every practice in town. medicine is definitely an art with a side order of psychology.
the vet is trying to work out they have the means that allows the vet to do gold standard medicine, get a firm diagnosis, prescribe the best treatment, or make an informed guess at what they think is going on, based on the information in front of them, interpreted through their own experience. Sometimes the conversation may go that they could do x y or z tests but the treatment for all the likely conditions would be the same, however having a diagnosis would inform on the likely success of this treatment and future prognosis.
a lot of clients do seem to think that vets have a crystal ball… often you only know if a test was necessary once you get the results back, many things involve a process of elimination. Unfortunately you can’t just plug them into one of those machines that they have at the car dealership and see which error code comes up.