Hi all. Just looking for some advice to see who's in the wrong here.
I work from home 2 days a week. Went PT when I had my daughter who is now 4 and started school in September.
Single parent and dd lives with me.
As it was half term last week, working proved a little more difficult. The first day was okay, but the second day was difficult in the afternoon so I asked my manager if I could finish early. We have flexi so usually not an issue.
My manager asked how I was going to cope in the summer holidays and said that my ex would have to step up and take some annual leave to watch her when I work on occasion. Otherwise I would have to get childcare and go into the office. Everyone on my team works from home. I also have plenty of annual leave to take.
So I spoke to ex on Friday and asked him if he would be able to take some time off to help during the holidays and explained what my manager had said.
His answer was no. Why should he take annual leave just so I can work? He added that this is what he pays child maintenance for.
When I applied for CM he was extremely annoyed. He called them and the lady told him apparently that the CM covers everything that he doesn't have to pay another penny. He also thinks that gifts from him for birthdays and Christmas should come out of the CM. Even though he does buy her gifts for both of these occasions.
I explained that the CM was to cover her general living costs. He doesn't buy clothes or shoes or pay towards activities. It all comes from the CM which is fine by me.
He then said that when he called CM when I first applied he wished he had asked them if there was any way I could be accountable for the moment in the form of receipts to him to make sure I wasn't spending it on myself!! He actually said tobacco and drinks. I do smoke and I usually have the odd drink in the house on a Friday night. Sometimes one or two in the week. Certainly none of his money goes on me.
So is this the case? Is child maintenance basically paying the resident parent to look after the child whilst the other absolves themselves of any sort of responsibility?