Subjects with smaller numbers are being cut, especially in creative arts. Therefore curriculum, especially at GCSE level is more narrow.
Upper sets in subjects like Maths have 40 students in them.
Increasing use of TAs instead of proper teachers to cover long term absence and short term absence.
Fewer students offered single sciences and languages.
Only employing early career teachers who are just qualified and encouraging older more experienced and expensive teachers to leave.
Less support for children with SEN, meaning more teacher time is needed, and less teacher inout for everyone.
Less admin support/caretaking/cleaning. Teachers have to do more of this stuff meaning less time for preparation and marking. When teachers have do more of the admin roles other tasks, they rightly don’t just add loads of extra hours to their days. The time comes out of time they’d spend planning and marking. They have had real term pay cuts of close to 20% over the last 15 years and although they’ve been willing to go above and beyond, goodwill is running thin and lots of teachers are leaving as the lack of funding makes everything harder and harder.
It might appear that ancillary stuff is being cut, but if parents knew the teacher time per head that students are receiving, compared to a few years ago, they would be shocked. With larger classes and more lessons not having a teacher in them, it’s a significantly poorer education than a few years ago.
Schools generally don’t like to tell parents. They present a good front, struggle on and paper over the cracks whilst they can. The difficulty is that the cracks are becoming so large that they are more and more evident. I think it’s good that the school has been honest about the position. Hopefully parents will write to their MP and complain and not blame the school.