I think there have probably been other points in history when both adults and children have been under severe, chronic stress. Perhaps WWII.
They weren’t obese.
One of the problems we have nowadays is that the stress we’re under is not the life threatening sort, which leads to more insidious, difficult to treat mental illnesses, (which also probably weren’t around as commonly during WW11) which often really need the sufferer to train themselves to focus on other things, a bit like losing weight requires you to make changes.
Overeating wasn’t going to happen for anyone during WW11, so it’s not the greatest comparison.
People react to living lives that are unnecessarily difficult, and it starts young. Obesity is a symptom of this.
It’s a perfect storm of outdated bad science still passed on to everyone, too much pressure to perform well in school, in work, on social media, in extra curricular activities, many of us managing disabilities, disabled children (pretty sure the increase in stress in schools has contributed to higher levels of SN), high levels of clever marketing aimed directly at us if we open a magazine or turn in the tv, polarised views on everything that keeps us invested and angry, and whilst some people are obviously perfect and are able to overcome this onslaught of shit, not everyone can do that. There’s no way that 2/3 of people are overweight or obese simply because they’re lazy fuckers, it just doesn’t add up. None of this whole paragraph was an issue to anyone 80 years ago.
Obesity is a symptom of a societal problem. That’s not taking any personal responsibility away from anyone, but things don’t happen on that scale without reasons, and there are too many overlaps with obesity and mental illness, obesity and neurodivergence, obesity following onset of many illnesses for there not to be links, so simply putting it down to laziness doesn’t follow.
Our bodies have been changed by the poisons put in them, and then we’re blamed for being out of control? What exactly did anyone expect? UPFs are designed to be addictive, you can hardly beat people with a stick for becoming addicted to the very stuff made to do just that! If it’s such a huge cost to the nhs they need to be banned - but they won’t be because they make too much money. You can’t set up systems that result in this and then blame the people targeted.
If I understand correctly, the biggest cost in drug prescribing to the NHS is for diabetes drugs - so why aren’t they working hard to update their diet advice? Why are they still advising a diet which some researchers think caused the obesity epidemic in the first place because it stopped people eating real food?
Research about low carbing and its effect on diabetes has been known for at least 20 years now, why are so many drs still saying it’s dangerous and faddy? In the case of diabetes the NHS is actively keeping patients fatter and iller. Why?