I work as a bank shift youth worker for a local council in Scotland.
I volunteered for 6 months then had a job interview for a bank youth worker and was successful. Have been with them for 2 years now.
I have fallen into a routine where I work a Monday evening and Wednesday evening at specific youth groups. I have no contract and I submit a time sheet, so if the group gets cancelled on a night I don't get paid, when it is off during the summer/Easter etc I don't get paid. My colleagues with a contract do get paid during this time.
I was always happy with this arrangement as I am a single mum, completing my masters and in a full time placement so I liked the flexibility of it. Being able to say, 'I can't make do the group in two weeks time' etc without it going down as an absence or being seen as unreliable. This doesn't happen often at all.
Tonight I text my boss (as we always communicate) to say that I wouldn't be able to attend the group in two weeks time.
She then phoned me and said that although I don't have a contract, 'a Monday and Wednesday evening is your job, I wouldn't give it to anyone else'. When I said I was under the impression I was a bank worker she said, 'yes but contracts are difficult to come by these days and I have to treat all staff fairly. So although to me I don't mind a bit of flexibility, to others this might look as if it's an absence. Usually I would ask staff to make up their hours but I don't do that with you'.
I was kind of blindsided and also confused by the whole conversation. She said she would see what she could do about cover the night I said I couldn't go in but she couldn't guarantee anything.
After reflecting on it, I'm now left scratching my head. I specifically went for bank position due to flexibility, and surely, they can't treat me as a contracted member of staff if I'm...not contracted?
AIBU or just thick? Have I missed something?
I am drafting up an email tomorrow to go over this but just wanted to check I wasn't being unreasonable first.