We say the same about 90% of meals out. Crap for the money. We could have had far nicer at home for a fifth of the price.
What we want to know is who the HELL is rating all these places as "5* A-may-zing"?!
I don't know anyone, I don't think, who can't cook a half decent meal at least. So who is finding this shoddy plate of food so fabulous? And what gets me as well, is this is supposedly their professional line of work, not the person next door trying their hand at something.
I'd would love, LOVE to be able to go out for an decently priced meal, and thoroughly enjoy it. But when we (family of 5) went out for a roast and spend well over £100 with pudding, and the meat is dry, and the spuds are hard, it's a joke.
We took my parents out last week for DF's birthday. Good restaurant. Nice, but not exceptional food. £265. Two bottles of wine and 3 courses. Four of us. And it was quite nice. I wouldn't go as far to recommend the place, but I thought the food was above average. To feel like we'd had good value, the price needed to have been £160. It's the top rated place in my county to eat. Shocking.
Honestly, I'd rather spend £15 at Wetherspoons. Yeah, my lasagne and chips has come straight from the freezer, but it's ok. And my expectations are so low, so I'm more likely to be pleasantly surprised.
I just can't understand how bad most people's home cooking must be for them to rate such shite establishments so highly and actually enjoy the naff food. Unless they are bought/fake reviews?