I work in a local authority and took a pay cut from my previous role to work there. I was told at the time of accepting the job that they couldn't match my previous salary (although it was in the parameters of their pay band) and policy was to put me at the lowest spinal point of the band. This was about a 3k pay cut.
Eighteen months on, I've been offered a new job in the same authority but in a different team. The role is more suited to my previous experience and in the same band I am now. I asked to be put at the higher end of the band to reflect the fact I'd taken a pay cut to work in the organisation. They said no. I now find out my male predecessor had worked in the role for 12 months and had negotiated his salary at the time of appointment to be placed at the top point of the band. It feels slightly unfair to me given we have a similar level of experience (in fact I have more) but he was able to negotiate and I wasn't.
Is it worth pursuing or should I just accept? It's a good fit for me but the difference in pay offer between what my predecessor was receiving and what I've been offered is 5k which is a decent amount per month.
Am I right to feel a bit miffed by this? It's a like for like job and I'd be taking on all of his responsibilities.