@Bamboux why would I not think you live in London. It's a big place, there are a lot of us.
It's regrettable that you felt the need to cancel your plans to visit your terminally ill friend. Travel in the area affected by today's event appears fine to me, but we must all make our own decisions based on our personal circumstances.
You said that you'd attended a number of events. They are guaranteed to have caused inconvenience and disruption and possibly made people cancel their plans. But you went ahead because you thought your interest was important.
Why is any other interest of no importance because you don't agree or you don't like the people holding those views?
According to you I have no right to express an opinion because you don't like where I live. Other people are middle class wankers or have the wrong colour skin. Excuse me if I'm wrong but I think it was you who objected to a woman and her child disco dancing in front of Buckingham Palace. What on earth could be wrong with that? The front of Buckingham Palace is pedestrianised so they weren't holding up the traffic and probably gave the tourists something else to take pictures of.
What do you think are legitimate matters for peaceful public protest in the United Kingdom? What are not suitable causes, and what powers do you think the police and the criminal justice system should have to stop them and punish the offenders?
If the protest does turn ugly, what do you think should happen to the protesters, police who may have criminally assaulted them or members of the public tempted to take the law into their own hands?
This government would be really keen on your thoughts. They are seeking to aggressively curtail the rights to public protest and would also like to withdraw the right to strike from a raft of workers and portray them as enemies of the state and the ordinary public - including the ones the public generally like such as nurses and doctors.
If this government brings in laws to curtail people's right to peacefully protest, do you think Suella Braverman will say: "Oh, except the marches that Bamboux wants to go on. Can we put in a clause saying the Met Commissioner has to ring her to see if it's okay before going ahead?"
I don't think you do, but I don't understand why you would seek to put any more restrictions on the right to protest. That is what you are asking for.