DD has a number of food allergies. The only time we've been to hospital was during weaning when her head swelled up after peanut butter. No treatment needed beyond antihistamines, which is how we've managed any other reactions since.
Requests for an epipen were denied as she's not had anaphylaxis and isn't high risk (bad asthma etc) - have been nervous about this especially during ambulance strikes but it is what it is.
She'll go on her first flight this year to North America, when doing travel insurance we declared the food allergies but said no to "life threatening allergies" - saying yes would add £200+ to the quote.
Knowing that PBJs are more likely to be kicking around a playground than here, and because of the flight we requested an epipen again which was approved. Its a holiday prescription so not a long term thing and her consultant described it as "an abundance of caution". The paperwork to carry it on the flight states the patient is at risk of life threatening allergies...
So do we need to update the insurance? There's no change to her health so I'm loathe to give them hundreds of pounds more, but I'd hate them to slither out of a claim if the worst happened