This is utterly medieval.
You said "respected"? no it isn't
you implied "scientific"? no it isn't
stop your stupid pathetic "victim blaming" and try using a few critical thinking facilities if you have any
This is not an organisation that commands any respect, or a publication that is capable of any evaluative analysis.
Anyone can call themselves a "psychologist" anyone at all. Anyone student with any gap in their honours programme can plug it up with easy worthless psychology units, it is the least respected and least restricted academic discipline. I should know, I have seen many students through proper science degrees in hard disciplines in recent years, and seen them patch gaps with easy worthless psychology units when they need to, to make up a full programme - it doesn't impact too much on their employment prospects, as long as most of their units are really genuinely scientific, in fact it can be seen as an advantage to experience and understand the poor quality of scientific thinking in this sector, so yo are better able to evaluate wild and baseless claims like this when you come across them.
This means absolutely nothing at all, other than a few nutters who think they are so superior to everyone else who are scientifically illiterate think it is ok to dial back literally a THOUSAND years to blame patients for their illnesses.
This is NOT science
This is NOT medical research
You need to be seriously ashamed of yourself for pedalling this crappy woo