This is more of a question of "is this particularly unreasonable", as morally it is somewhat unreasonable regardless.
I work for a private ambulance company, my maternity leave ends May 1st. Request for flexible working (1/2 my normal hours) was declined. Taking my annual leave at the end which takes me up to July 1st, but was hoping to be off till September 1st with PT.
I'm not planning on staying. I've been studying my entire maternity leave to mean I have an extra qualification allowing me to work in a more advanced healthcare role. The course is due to finish in August and I have already secured a provisional offer of employment elsewhere, hence wanting my annual leave to take me to September so I can leave and take a new role in a different setting.
I made the decision that I wanted to leave during my pregnancy when my employer tried to sack me for not wanting the COVID vaccine whilst I was pregnant, even though I was WFH in an admin role with no physical contact with patients or colleagues, and the "law" explicitly excluded the requirement for circumstances like mine but my employer didn't care and tried it anyway. The working conditions before I got pregnant were getting worse (shifts lasting 2+ hours longer than they should, getting grief off of the control centre because we were stuck at hospital, not getting proper breaks, etc), and aren't any better now from what I've heard.
I've suffered with postpartum hyperthyroidism and so have lost a huge amount of weight and am still struggling with insomnia. I do not feel I'd be physically fit enough to manual handle in any case and I'm not interested in taking a clinical telephone role.
So, the AIBVU... to take the two months I was intending on taking as annual leave, as sick, due to the fact they won't allow me to drop my hours?