Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To dislike the redundant prefix

19 replies

Neededanewuserhandle · 30/01/2023 10:55

I know this is a niche area and also that people who care about SPAG tend to be vilified on MN, but I like the economy of expression that comes from English having so many words that you can always find one that fits. Warn and book have particular meanings and don't require the "pre" prefix - pre-warn, pre-book.

OP posts:
PrehistoricGarbageTruck · 30/01/2023 10:59

In our house we say "pre-prepare".... as a joke! At least it started out as a joke, but now means e.g. get cups and teabags out but don't actually "prepare" the tea yet...

SavoirFlair · 30/01/2023 11:01

this is spot on @Neededanewuserhandle but you’ll sadly get shouted down by the usual folk saying

• languages evolve over time ( !! 🤣 )
• people know what I mean so what’s the problem? 🙄

ComtesseDeSpair · 30/01/2023 11:04

I believe there’s a nuance between e.g. book and pre-book (the latter implies tentativeness) which has been gradually lost as practices have changed: to “book” something meant to literally write and record it (and it’s still used in that way in accounting and insurance) whereas to pre-book it would be more akin to noting it but not fixing the occurrence. The same nuance will apply to other prefixed words. They probably are redundant to some extent, though not necessarily incorrect, and I imagine will just gradually fade out of usage.

ReamsOfCheese · 30/01/2023 11:08

Pedants corner is that way >>>>

CitronVert22 · 30/01/2023 11:10

How do you feel about forewarn? That seems more correct because it sounds older, but logically suffers from the same issue.

Neededanewuserhandle · 30/01/2023 11:17

ReamsOfCheese · 30/01/2023 11:08

Pedants corner is that way >>>>

That's a bit pedantic

OP posts:
senua · 30/01/2023 11:18

CitronVert22 · 30/01/2023 11:10

How do you feel about forewarn? That seems more correct because it sounds older, but logically suffers from the same issue.

Forewarn is acceptable.
To warn is to give notice of danger. Example: watch out, that branch is falling!
To forewarn is to warn before the event. Example: if you don't prune that branch then it could fall on someone.

NameOchangeO1 · 30/01/2023 11:20

Doesn't the prefix lengthen the time between the warning and the event? A bit like warn and forewarn, which kind of mean the same thing but also not quite.

I agree with you on pre-book, though, seems unnecessary. Because booking is an action which has quite a lot of certainty arising it. "I've booked a flight" is accurate. "I've pre-booked a flight" is silly.

But people do like to complicate and misuse language - see current uptick in use of "side profile". Makes my teeth itch.

senua · 30/01/2023 11:22

'Uptick' makes my teeth itch.Grin

DuplicateUserName · 30/01/2023 11:25

I know this is a niche area and also that people who care about SPAG tend to be vilified on MN

I'm pretty sure they're only 'vilified' for acting like the forum monitor, and rudely picking strangers up on their SPaG?

kingtamponthefurred · 30/01/2023 11:29

ReamsOfCheese · 30/01/2023 11:08

Pedants corner is that way >>>>

Don't you mean 'pedants' corner'?

NeverDropYourMooncup · 30/01/2023 11:33

Well 'pencilling it in for Thursday at 3' is pretty much obsolete.

Would happily ban pre-meeting meetings, though. In word and particularly in deed.

Palmfrond · 30/01/2023 11:39

Neededanewuserhandle · 30/01/2023 10:55

I know this is a niche area and also that people who care about SPAG tend to be vilified on MN, but I like the economy of expression that comes from English having so many words that you can always find one that fits. Warn and book have particular meanings and don't require the "pre" prefix - pre-warn, pre-book.

I think they do have a minuscule difference in meaning, but otherwise part of a trend toward “more is more”, possibly due to insecurity (appropriate insecurity as it turns out) about using insufficiently “proper” (read “posh) English.
A bit like the use of ‘yourself’ instead of ‘you’, or dropping random ‘whoms’ when they mean ‘who’, but not as bad.

WineDup · 30/01/2023 11:45

NameOchangeO1 · 30/01/2023 11:20

Doesn't the prefix lengthen the time between the warning and the event? A bit like warn and forewarn, which kind of mean the same thing but also not quite.

I agree with you on pre-book, though, seems unnecessary. Because booking is an action which has quite a lot of certainty arising it. "I've booked a flight" is accurate. "I've pre-booked a flight" is silly.

But people do like to complicate and misuse language - see current uptick in use of "side profile". Makes my teeth itch.

Prebooking of flights does happen, just not by the general public. For example a tour operator might prebook an allocation of seats, and then book them with the passengers name.

ToastAndButler · 30/01/2023 11:47

Doesn't the prefix lengthen the time between the warning and the event? A bit like warn and forewarn, which kind of mean the same thing but also not quite.

Yes, this. The OED certainly defines them differently.

I think this is generally how people use them- a pre-booked taxi is booked further in advance than a booked one, a pre-ordered novel is ordered before it's available to buy, and so on. Yes, we could certainly get by without the prefix but I don't think that means that it adds nothing or that "pre-warn" and "warn" mean exactly the same. Economy of expression is great but not to the point where you lose nuance.

DingDonkey · 30/01/2023 11:47

NameOchangeO1 · 30/01/2023 11:20

Doesn't the prefix lengthen the time between the warning and the event? A bit like warn and forewarn, which kind of mean the same thing but also not quite.

I agree with you on pre-book, though, seems unnecessary. Because booking is an action which has quite a lot of certainty arising it. "I've booked a flight" is accurate. "I've pre-booked a flight" is silly.

But people do like to complicate and misuse language - see current uptick in use of "side profile". Makes my teeth itch.

Yes, you wouldn't pre-book a flight but you might pre-book seats or pre-book a meal. I think the "pre" implies that the booking is not essential.

AlecTrevelyan006 · 30/01/2023 11:49

I don’t like the phrase ‘book in advance’

i can’t book it afterwards can I???

DuplicateUserName · 30/01/2023 11:58

AlecTrevelyan006 · 30/01/2023 11:49

I don’t like the phrase ‘book in advance’

i can’t book it afterwards can I???

Surely it means in advance of the day?

We run ticketed events at work and people think they can turn up and book on the day, but we need more notice than that.

PlaitBilledDuckyPuss · 30/01/2023 12:10

I suppose it's quicker to say 'tickets must be pre-booked' than 'tickets must be booked in advance of the day of the event'

New posts on this thread. Refresh page