In all the threads about the H&M documentary, no one seems that bothered about the role of the advisors to the royal family.
I find it hard to wrap my head around the idea of a family, chosen by God to rule. But
as a republican I can accept it as the will of the British people that their head of state be chosen in this way. And the real work of governance is (generally) by their elected representatives.
So I find it disturbing that unelected, unaccountable people control advise the monarch and to a greater or lesser extent steer the narrative. The media are also unelected, but at least people can vote with their wallet so to some extent they can claim a mandate.
Who appoints these advisors? Within their own ranks is there a representative spread of age, gender, class and ethnicity? What qualifies them to advise?
(Given that QEII failed to prevent BJ illegally proroguing parliament, its clear that constitutional law doesn’t feature)
Harry’s account of the two conversations with his grandmother was a very poignant example. I know this isn’t anything new, but AIBU to think it should provoke some concern and discussion regardless of where people stand on M&H?