I think the assumption that adding another layer of admin into the processes would somehow make it easier and less appointments would be missed is really naive.
How many appointments are genuinely missed because someone thinks “I can’t be arsed today?”
And how would you safeguard the people who didn’t get letters, got letters late, couldn’t get through to cancel or rearrange, take ill on the day, have disabilities or mental health issues that stop them getting to the hospital, have technology difficulty so can’t cancel/get through to rearrange, or who simply make a mistake about the date of the appointment that was originally made 2 years ago and has subsequently been changed half a dozen times?
Plus what then happens when someone gets fined? What’s the financial implication of banning Steve from having another MRI appointment until he pays up, but then he ends up with a much more difficult, and expensive, condition to treat by the time he ends up in A&E weeks and months later?
And what happens to Betty who missed hers because of her learning difficulties and is on benefits so she can’t afford the fine? Does she just get left until her condition is critical or do people with difficulties end up not being fined which then adds another layer of admin because they then have to work out who should and shouldn’t be fined depending on their circumstances?
and how is that done in a timely fashion so that Mary, who never got a letter, doesn’t end up with her cancer professing further while she waits on a decision about something that wasn’t her fault?
Theres a reason it’s never been implemented on any of the occasions it’s been mooted. Because it’s just not a good idea.
and actually only benefits the NT people who actively chose not to bother and can afford the fine because their new appointment will be much sooner if all the people with issues get bumped out of the way!