Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Nuclear fusion - happy coincidence?

12 replies

maeveiscurious · 13/12/2022 18:32

It's now "viable" now western energy sources at risk.

OP posts:
enjoyingscience · 13/12/2022 18:34

I mean, they’ve been working on it for a while, so yes, I’d say a happy coincidence. And it’s not ‘viable’ it’s just a step closer. Still a way off yet. It’s mainly funded by western countries and has been for over 20 years - have a look at JET in the UK and plans for ITER in France.

JudithHarper · 13/12/2022 18:35

I doubt I will see a commercial reactor supplying the grid in my lifetime (I'm in my early 50s)

validnumber · 13/12/2022 18:36

Don't think so.
Sky news article says it could take decades to make it widely available and Scientists in Oxfordshire did something similar earlier in the year. So it's been planned for a long time.
This one happened last week.
I was excited when I read the headline then disappointed to read the article. Esp when it said it took more every to power up the lasers in the first place!
The safety of producing a 'star' on earth is scary too!

maeveiscurious · 13/12/2022 18:37

I think we will see it come through quicker than anticipated, energy and clean energy is essential

OP posts:
maeveiscurious · 13/12/2022 18:37

validnumber · 13/12/2022 18:36

Don't think so.
Sky news article says it could take decades to make it widely available and Scientists in Oxfordshire did something similar earlier in the year. So it's been planned for a long time.
This one happened last week.
I was excited when I read the headline then disappointed to read the article. Esp when it said it took more every to power up the lasers in the first place!
The safety of producing a 'star' on earth is scary too!

I cdd as by even think about cern

OP posts:
PhotoDad · 13/12/2022 18:40

I am cautiously optimistic that we can reduce the "maybe in 50 years" (which has been the prediction since the '50s) to "maybe in 30 years." But I think that the place to watch is ITER rather than the Inertial Confinement method being used in the States.

Workerbeep · 13/12/2022 18:55

Hmmm I’m not convinced. Latest news…It’s taken 70 years to prove that ignition is possible.

Perhaps this is because not much investment and research has been made into fusion until recently.

maeveiscurious · 13/12/2022 18:59

I think that providing energy cleanly and need to be a top priority.

OP posts:
Echobelly · 13/12/2022 19:00

TBF, all they've done is get more energy out than in; there's a loooong way to go before they can scale it up and make it sustainable. But it's a great start.

No 'happy coincidence' - as people have said, it's been being worked on for a long time and of course it's being taken more seriously now more people are clearly understanding the 'non-renewable' bit of non-renewables.

CMOTDibbler · 13/12/2022 19:08

The research has been going on a very long time to make this happen. Around Culham in the UK there are 4 fusion companies that I know of as well as JET (where I spent a very happy summer as a student), the massive ITER project, and lots of others using different techniques. This weeks news was showing they could make it happen again after a series of failures. With fusion, the devil is very much in the detail and it will be a long time before it is commercial as a power source imo

KrisAkabusi · 13/12/2022 19:16

No, it will be at least 30 years before any electricity is produced in this way.

PlaitBilledDuckyPuss · 13/12/2022 19:17

I got all excited about the possibility of cheaper heating until I read the article and realised I will probably be dead before it comes into use.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread