Personally, I think the constant fear regarding gas bills is counterproductive and will lead to people freezing to death or becoming very ill this winter.
All the media coverage is about high bills and reducing usage, but I've not seen any official experimental data regarding the best way to run your heating.
The media tell us it's a ''myth" that running heating 24x7 is cheaper than intermittent heating. Even if we accept that's true, which I don't think it necessarily is, what is the percentage difference?
It is basic scientific fact that any energy lost, when an object cools, will need to be added again to heat it back up to the previous temperature. That gives a net saving of zero. The only difference is the thermodynamic aspect - i.e. a warmer object loses more heat than a cooler object.
How great is that thermodynamic element at various outdoor temperatures?
If it's only a few percent, then is it worth sitting in a freezing home? Is the thermodynamic element outweighed by enhanced boiler efficiency from small low power burns vs the long 'full whack' burns required for intermittent heating?
How about setting a constant 18C vs heating to 21C twice a day. Which is more expensive?
Without official government experimental data, how can people make informed decisions?
I worry that vulnerable people have been scared into turning off their heating or running it in an inefficient manner that results in long periods of freezing temperatures that don't actually have any tangible savings.