That’s not necessarily true for those not fortunate enough to be in a defined pension scheme though, is it? I’m 51, and I reached the lifetime allowance a few years ago. I still work, because frankly the return on just over a million, even if you assume 4% drawdown, is not enough to maintain my lifestyle. So I just invest/save more from taxed income so that I can retire in comfort.
the problem with NHS pensions isn’t a tax problem, they are treated the same as non public sector workers from a lifetime allowance and annual allowance perpective. We all get the same. But in the private sector employers have adapted and offer different packages to those who opt out of the pension, my employer for example contributes 10% of earnings into a pension. But for those who’ve hit the LTA we are paid the equivalent to the employers contribution as part of salary. Sure, it’s taxed, but I can invest as I see fit at that point. The NHS has an employer problem, not an HMRC problem, because they haven’t come up with alternative solutions to motivate nhs workers to keep working.
I think that’s fair enough… if there was no LTA but the same £40k annual allowance then I, as a 45% tax payer, would get £18k of tax relief every year. Given the average income in the country is about £30k, on which you’d pay around £4k tax, that’d mean that nearly 5 average taxpayers would be working and paying tax just to cover the tax relief on my pension contribution. That just doesn’t seem right.