Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To socialise when baby has a rash

18 replies

HopefulRose · 25/11/2022 08:53

Doctor said it’s a viral rash. He doesn’t have a temperature (the baby, not the doctor) and he is otherwise completely normal. Rash is still visible.

Am I being unreasonable to continue to go out to playgroups and socialise if he has this rash?

sorry if it’s a stupid question, first time mum here and I don’t have any family to ask

OP posts:
cuminpotato · 25/11/2022 08:54

YABVU

HopefulRose · 25/11/2022 08:58

@cuminpotato can I ask why? Contagion happens before the rash breaks out

OP posts:
CherieBabySpliffUp · 25/11/2022 08:58

Has the Dr actually seen the rash or was it a phone consultation? I think I would stay in for a week and then reassess.

Geneticsbunny · 25/11/2022 09:00

If the baby isn't ill I would still go out. Maybe avoid baby groups out of politeness but anything else is fine.

BakedTattie · 25/11/2022 09:01

Babies get viral rashes all the time. I’d still take them out if baby isn’t clearly upset, whingy

Skinnermarink · 25/11/2022 09:03

Yes, he’s been checked out by a doctor. If he’s otherwise well with no temp, I’d not be imprisoning myself with a baby for a week, for goodness sake. I know it’s good to be cautious but that doesn’t mean all ability to think critically should go out the window 🤣

Skinnermarink · 25/11/2022 09:04

That’s not directed at you by the way OP. I think it’s a fair question. But there are a few rather zealous posters that think you should consider shipping off to a leper colony for every minor ailment.

HopefulRose · 25/11/2022 09:06

@Skinnermarink @Geneticsbunny thanks both, my gut tells me he’s fine to take out but it’s just the worry of upsetting anyone. My MH needs to get out of the house though!

OP posts:
HopefulRose · 25/11/2022 09:13

@CherieBabySpliffUp yes the doctor saw the rash earlier this week and said from a polite POV staying away from playgroups would be advised so we wouldn’t be blamed for an outbreak but medically it shouldn’t be a problem which is .. confusing

OP posts:
ForTheLoveOfSleep · 25/11/2022 09:18

The GP was just letting you know that people don't generally understand rash doesn't always mean infectious. Some parents at playgroups may then blame you if their child gets ill even though it wasn't the cause iyswim. So go out and about but for your own sanity stay away from baby and toddler groups.

RambamThankyouMam · 25/11/2022 09:21

I wouldn't.

Babies' health can change so quickly. I wouldn't risk passing something on to others either.

Hugasauras · 25/11/2022 09:21

I would carry on if baby is well. Little babies are covered in all sorts of random spots and rashes. Newborn acne, eczema, drool rash, teething, whatever. I wouldn't think twice about seeing a baby with a rash at one of our classes.

Hugasauras · 25/11/2022 09:22

And DD1 quite often got 'viral' rashes that never actually came to anything!

thaegumathteth · 25/11/2022 09:23

I'd never have left the house if I'd stayed in whenever mine had a rash

RunLolaRun102 · 25/11/2022 09:24

GPs can be pretty terrible at diagnosing babies and toddlers. Mine said DS red cheeks were nothing just a ‘virus’ - his Scarlet Fever was then later diagnosed at the Urgent Care Centre by an ECP when he stopped eating. Best to keep your DC away from baby and toddler groups.

ThePumpking · 25/11/2022 09:24

My eldest got viral rashes any time they had even a slight sniffle. Go have fun with your baby

girlmom21 · 25/11/2022 09:29

I wouldn't go to playgroups. That's unfair.

itsalldowntome · 25/11/2022 09:32

I would still go out for fresh air but avoid playgroups myself.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page