Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think £800p/m is pretty generous?

417 replies

Cuppasoupmonster · 08/11/2022 20:30

Off the back of the ‘trapped women’ thread, out of curiosity I used ‘Entitled To’ to find out what I could claim if I was a single mum of 2 primary aged kids with no savings and an ex who paid the minimum in maintenance. The hypothetical single mum earns 1,300 p/m and rents a property costing £900 p/m.

The calculator said the minimum she would be entitled to would be £800p/m, which in my view is about right. Yet I hear a lot that benefits are a pittance and had assumed that to be the case, but I was pleasantly surprised by the result.

Am I overlooking something? Not trying to be goady, I’m genuinely curious.

YABU = £800 isn’t enough in these circumstances
YANBU = £800 is about right or even generous

OP posts:
Cuppasoupmonster · 09/11/2022 11:35

@Haddle im sorry you feel that way but I haven’t bashed benefit claimants in any way. I’ve said, I was pleasantly surprised to see that in some cases (like my hypothetical but fairly common one) that people aren’t treated as badly as is sometimes implied on here.

OP posts:
Haddle · 09/11/2022 11:39

If you can hand on heart say it was purely out of curiosity that you spent time putting your details into entitled to, then started a thread about it on Mumsnet with the purest of intentions, then fair play.

I doubt that though.

Cuppasoupmonster · 09/11/2022 11:40

Yep, I can, hand on heart.

OP posts:
Haddle · 09/11/2022 11:42

I wish there was a way for people like you and I to swap lives for a year.

Be thankful for what you have. Stop worrying about other peoples hypothetical lives.

Cuppasoupmonster · 09/11/2022 11:46

Haddle · 09/11/2022 11:42

I wish there was a way for people like you and I to swap lives for a year.

Be thankful for what you have. Stop worrying about other peoples hypothetical lives.

Where am I ‘worrying’?

OP posts:
Thefriendlyone · 09/11/2022 11:46

Astounded at some of these comments. Effectively saying benefits should also provide enough so claimants can have savings and make sure they’ve money for unexpected events, what sort of planet do people live on where they think this should be a thing, and that if you up benefits to more than to live month to month every single person would save the extra. Benefits are not intended to keep people super comfortable for gods sake and provide more than a low earner who is unentitled can have.

it’s money they take off of those working and they then give to those who are not, to ensure they can house and feed themselves. It is not for some cushy life with an account full of savings.

onmytenthcoffee · 09/11/2022 11:48

I actually think it's fine. For context I've used benefits a few times, always as a stop gap.

I used JSA when I was 18 and moved cities before getting a job. It was fine to live on.

I used ESA during my mental health breakdown and again it was a good amount.

I used Income Support as a single mum and was pretty damn well off actually with rent paid and spending money.

What I can't comment on is if you have a child with a disability, because I have no idea how much that costs and it could well not be enough. I don't know.

But in reality any money for doing absolutely nothing is good.

ancientgran · 09/11/2022 11:54

Cuppasoupmonster · 09/11/2022 11:29

Up until 3 months ago that was the case. It will be the case again for 2+ years when I go back to work after this baby is born. I highly doubt I will have paid off my mortgage by the time I retire, what with the frightening rise in payments.

You haven't considered that the single parent might have childcare costs as well. You are being quite selective.

MoneyTalks202 · 09/11/2022 11:57

Thefriendlyone · 09/11/2022 11:46

Astounded at some of these comments. Effectively saying benefits should also provide enough so claimants can have savings and make sure they’ve money for unexpected events, what sort of planet do people live on where they think this should be a thing, and that if you up benefits to more than to live month to month every single person would save the extra. Benefits are not intended to keep people super comfortable for gods sake and provide more than a low earner who is unentitled can have.

it’s money they take off of those working and they then give to those who are not, to ensure they can house and feed themselves. It is not for some cushy life with an account full of savings.

Completely agree.

Apparently having a holiday every year is a human right too!

ancientgran · 09/11/2022 11:58

Thefriendlyone · 09/11/2022 11:46

Astounded at some of these comments. Effectively saying benefits should also provide enough so claimants can have savings and make sure they’ve money for unexpected events, what sort of planet do people live on where they think this should be a thing, and that if you up benefits to more than to live month to month every single person would save the extra. Benefits are not intended to keep people super comfortable for gods sake and provide more than a low earner who is unentitled can have.

it’s money they take off of those working and they then give to those who are not, to ensure they can house and feed themselves. It is not for some cushy life with an account full of savings.

Why shouldn't people be able to have money for unexpected events. Having some money for say calling a taxi if your child is sick and there aren't any ambulances available isn't being super comfortable or having a cushy life. What's the betting that if the single parent on benefits came on here and said they were desperate as child sick, no ambulances and no money for a taxi, people would be saying they were irresponsible and should have saved some money for emergencies.

I've never had to rely on benefits but I don't want us to go back to the Poor Laws, I really think some people would love it.

MoneyTalks202 · 09/11/2022 11:58

onmytenthcoffee · 09/11/2022 11:48

I actually think it's fine. For context I've used benefits a few times, always as a stop gap.

I used JSA when I was 18 and moved cities before getting a job. It was fine to live on.

I used ESA during my mental health breakdown and again it was a good amount.

I used Income Support as a single mum and was pretty damn well off actually with rent paid and spending money.

What I can't comment on is if you have a child with a disability, because I have no idea how much that costs and it could well not be enough. I don't know.

But in reality any money for doing absolutely nothing is good.

Thank you for being honest.

It’s good the system supports people xx

FrancescaContini · 09/11/2022 12:00

@onmytenthcoffee ”Doing absolutely nothing” - is that what you think lone parents do?

Chesterdrawsseriously · 09/11/2022 12:01

ancientgran · 09/11/2022 11:58

Why shouldn't people be able to have money for unexpected events. Having some money for say calling a taxi if your child is sick and there aren't any ambulances available isn't being super comfortable or having a cushy life. What's the betting that if the single parent on benefits came on here and said they were desperate as child sick, no ambulances and no money for a taxi, people would be saying they were irresponsible and should have saved some money for emergencies.

I've never had to rely on benefits but I don't want us to go back to the Poor Laws, I really think some people would love it.

Is this a serious question? How much tax do you want people to pay? Tax payers are not Santa Claus. Even with the looming tax rises people will struggle, we need money for so many things, from the nhs, to schools to police to paying back our debts and here you are giving it let’s give the benefit claimants enough so they’ve savings?

never read anything so ludicrous.

onmytenthcoffee · 09/11/2022 12:01

FrancescaContini · 09/11/2022 12:00

@onmytenthcoffee ”Doing absolutely nothing” - is that what you think lone parents do?

I was a lone parent. I know what I did.
No one is every doing absolutely nothing.
I meant something you don't want with all your heart to do, as in mothering which is a joy not a chore.

onmytenthcoffee · 09/11/2022 12:02

FrancescaContini · 09/11/2022 12:00

@onmytenthcoffee ”Doing absolutely nothing” - is that what you think lone parents do?

I spent time with my baby.

That's not doing nothing but it's also not really doing anything.

onmytenthcoffee · 09/11/2022 12:03

also, I meant doing nothing to get the money. Not earning it. And I stand by that comment.

Cuppasoupmonster · 09/11/2022 12:09

ancientgran · 09/11/2022 11:54

You haven't considered that the single parent might have childcare costs as well. You are being quite selective.

But if they are they will be heavily subsidised as PP explained.

OP posts:
SofiaSoFar · 09/11/2022 12:10

Cuppasoupmonster · 08/11/2022 21:40

61% say IANBU but they’re too nervous to come on this thread I reckon!

Nothing to do with 'nervous', OP.

The majority clearly agree with you - as per the voting - but know it's a waste of time having such discussions on MN so they don't bother posting.

Cuppasoupmonster · 09/11/2022 12:12

onmytenthcoffee · 09/11/2022 12:02

I spent time with my baby.

That's not doing nothing but it's also not really doing anything.

MN will not recognising that not working, on a day to day level, is more pleasant than busting your arse in a stressful or physical job.

OP posts:
Cuppasoupmonster · 09/11/2022 12:12

*recognise

OP posts:
itsnotdeep · 09/11/2022 12:14

@onmytenthcoffee in recent years the conditions for getting benefits have got much stricter, and the sanctions much heavier. Very few people do nothing.

Most single parents are in work and caring for their children.

Plus if you look at this year alone, in April benefits went up by much less than the rate of inflation. I suspect Rishi is going to announce another real terms cut next week.

I don't actually think £800 a month for an adult and 2 children is generous. It isn't enough to do very much with, certainly not to cope with life shocks or one off events or costs. Or to give your child any treats. Or to let you get a hair cut. If you're comparing it to wages favourably, the answer isn't that benefits are too high it's that wages are too low.

Willyoujustbequiet · 09/11/2022 12:15

Cuppasoupmonster · 09/11/2022 11:14

We don’t though. Combined monthly income of ~4K, 2600 goes on mortgage and nursery so that leaves 1400 for everything else. That’s the same as hypothetical single mum, less if she gets child maintenance (or single dad to be fair 🤷🏼‍♀️)

The point of my thread wasn’t ‘AIBU to think they shouldn’t get as much’, it was to point out some benefit recipients aren’t doing as badly as MN would have you believe in the context of the current climate.

You are better off though. Significantly so.

Lots of people on UC have mortgages and get no help but you keep disregarding this.

Cuppasoupmonster · 09/11/2022 12:16

Willyoujustbequiet · 09/11/2022 12:15

You are better off though. Significantly so.

Lots of people on UC have mortgages and get no help but you keep disregarding this.

UC does offer financial assistance with mortgages.

OP posts:
onmytenthcoffee · 09/11/2022 12:17

Cuppasoupmonster · 09/11/2022 12:12

MN will not recognising that not working, on a day to day level, is more pleasant than busting your arse in a stressful or physical job.

Nah they recognise it, it's a cope.

Luckynumbereight · 09/11/2022 12:17

Thefriendlyone · 09/11/2022 11:46

Astounded at some of these comments. Effectively saying benefits should also provide enough so claimants can have savings and make sure they’ve money for unexpected events, what sort of planet do people live on where they think this should be a thing, and that if you up benefits to more than to live month to month every single person would save the extra. Benefits are not intended to keep people super comfortable for gods sake and provide more than a low earner who is unentitled can have.

it’s money they take off of those working and they then give to those who are not, to ensure they can house and feed themselves. It is not for some cushy life with an account full of savings.

I couldn’t agree more! As a foreigner who settled here without ever claiming a penny I’m constantly astounded by the absurd level of entitlement, and the incredible generosity shown by the UK government.

In most other countries (USA included) people would be living on the streets instead of being housed and fed for free. I have a staff member on UC who only works 15 hours a week and whose income is higher than mine. From where I’m standing all she had to do to get this was make a baby with a useless idiot.

Swipe left for the next trending thread