Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

If they "can't" do 50/50 shared care then they shouldn't be walking out

115 replies

Klinec · 07/11/2022 22:13

I'm talking about the men who walk out on their families whilst the kids are young and then say they can't do shared care because, for example:

He has shacked up with the OW and she doesn't have room for his DC to stay over because she's got loads of her own (and she doesn't want them there anyway)

He is sofa surfing / bunking on a mate or relatives sofa and can't have his DC live there regularly either.

His work schedule isn't compatible with having his DC overnight.

He works nights and isn't awake to collect them from school.

He can't have them at the weekend because he has to work etc etc.

Those are just a few shitty excuses some of these men give, I'm sure many of you can think of more.

I've just been thinking to myself that (in the absence of abuse ofc) if a man "can't" participate in shared care of his DC when he leaves the family home because he has no stable home to bring them to, then he should bloody well make sure he has a stable environment to go before he ups and leaves so he can begin sharing the childcare immediately.

Don't just walk out and leave it all to the mother, you shithouse.

If he's walking out with no long term plan and only somebody else's sofa in sight then he shouldn't be leaving at all until he has his "ducks in a row" IMO.

OK so I'm not suggesting anybody stay in a relationship they don't want to be in but it infuriates me how some men think its acceptable to just up and leave without any intention to continue looking after his own DC.

AIBU?

OP posts:
ApexLegend · 10/11/2022 15:15

Ineverwannabelikeyou · 10/11/2022 13:33

Were not talking about the ones that don't pay. Let's face it, if they don't pay they're not going to have their child 50% of the time. I'm specifically talking about reduction of maintenance not being okay but a direct reduction being fine.

Of course they could pay for childcare, but again that's not what was said. It was "change jobs and take the financial hit" without any regard for the child.

Why would they pay the market rate to the other parent? That's what maintenance is for.

Maintenance isn’t to cover the cost of the childcare that the other parent would pay!!! It’s to cover the expenses that the resident parent incurs!

If the NRP needs childcare for thr times they have their OWN kids they need to sort and pay for that themselves, not expect the other parent to do it for them!!! What if, god forbid, she had something better to do…?

Goldbar · 10/11/2022 17:53

ApexLegend · 10/11/2022 15:15

Maintenance isn’t to cover the cost of the childcare that the other parent would pay!!! It’s to cover the expenses that the resident parent incurs!

If the NRP needs childcare for thr times they have their OWN kids they need to sort and pay for that themselves, not expect the other parent to do it for them!!! What if, god forbid, she had something better to do…?

Exactly. It's unclear why NRPs should be entitled to treat RPs as cheap/free childcare, but it seems that many believe this to be OK.

ApexLegend · 10/11/2022 18:18

Goldbar · 10/11/2022 17:53

Exactly. It's unclear why NRPs should be entitled to treat RPs as cheap/free childcare, but it seems that many believe this to be OK.

I really want to hear more from @Ineverwannabelikeyou about this! Please explain why his childcare is my problem???

Ineverwannabelikeyou · 10/11/2022 19:11

ApexLegend · 10/11/2022 18:18

I really want to hear more from @Ineverwannabelikeyou about this! Please explain why his childcare is my problem???

Personally I think whoever has the child that day is responsible for the childcare. The maintenance is a contribution for the time under 50% that the other parent has them. I don't think the other parent is responsible for paying for childcare the rp has chosen, whether that's a man or a woman.

Ineverwannabelikeyou · 10/11/2022 19:12

ApexLegend · 10/11/2022 15:15

Maintenance isn’t to cover the cost of the childcare that the other parent would pay!!! It’s to cover the expenses that the resident parent incurs!

If the NRP needs childcare for thr times they have their OWN kids they need to sort and pay for that themselves, not expect the other parent to do it for them!!! What if, god forbid, she had something better to do…?

It's a contribution to the child, it's not a payment for the other parent doing childcare, which is what a pp suggested should be paid. I think you have completely misunderstood what I actually said there.

Onlyforcake · 10/11/2022 19:17

You're expecting someone who isn't prioritising relationship/ children/ family to just do those things?

I've never met a man that asked for 50/50. There's a reason their partners are through with them.

Ineverwannabelikeyou · 10/11/2022 19:20

Onlyforcake · 10/11/2022 19:17

You're expecting someone who isn't prioritising relationship/ children/ family to just do those things?

I've never met a man that asked for 50/50. There's a reason their partners are through with them.

What so all relationships are ended by women who are totally blameless are they?

napody · 10/11/2022 19:20

wibblewobbleboard · 07/11/2022 22:21

I did weird hours.

I'm female.

Are you suggesting I should've stayed and continued to be abused because I worked shifts and relied on childcare?

Eh? You sorted childcare, therefore you sorted it. Unless you relied on your ex for the majority of childcare (which I very much doubt). OP is talking about the person leaving dumping it all on their ex partner.

napody · 10/11/2022 19:24

110APiccadilly · 10/11/2022 11:08

Would you also take the view that the mother can't kick the father out unless he has somewhere to go that's big enough to have the children? Relationships break down from both sides. In my experience, both mothers and fathers often fail to consider the children's best interests when breaking up.

It should be more widely known that your parents breaking up is as damaging to a child, according to research, as one of them dying. I'm not saying people should stay though abuse or cheating (they absolutely shouldn't) but IMO some people end relationships that might be savable because they don't want to put the effort in, and either don't care or aren't aware how terrible that is for their children. And I've known that happen with both men and women instigating the break up.

Citation please.
If you're talking about ACEs there is a lot of debate about equating all these different events (such as death and divorce) without considering the context.

Straighouttaluck · 10/11/2022 19:49

Personally I would just like him to see the 3 children under 5 once a week, and declare his actual wages so I'm paid more than £7 a month.
But instead he turns up when he fancies and I get paid nil-£7 a month. Ohhhh how the men live.
On the bright side he's an abusive prick and atleast my kids won't learn his behaviours!

AuntieDickhead · 10/11/2022 20:01

Ineverwannabelikeyou · 10/11/2022 19:11

Personally I think whoever has the child that day is responsible for the childcare. The maintenance is a contribution for the time under 50% that the other parent has them. I don't think the other parent is responsible for paying for childcare the rp has chosen, whether that's a man or a woman.

Wouldn't it be nice if it did work like that! In my case what would happen is I'd get a message, maybe the Day before, maybe 5 mins before ex was due saying
"Sorry, can't have kids. I'm working/ helping a mate/whatever"
I'd reply "right. I'm also working. It's your day to have them"
Him "not my problem"

Right thanks.
What was even worse was that according to the CMS he doesn't work so doesn't pay any maintenance at all.

Ineverwannabelikeyou · 10/11/2022 20:11

AuntieDickhead · 10/11/2022 20:01

Wouldn't it be nice if it did work like that! In my case what would happen is I'd get a message, maybe the Day before, maybe 5 mins before ex was due saying
"Sorry, can't have kids. I'm working/ helping a mate/whatever"
I'd reply "right. I'm also working. It's your day to have them"
Him "not my problem"

Right thanks.
What was even worse was that according to the CMS he doesn't work so doesn't pay any maintenance at all.

Well obviously nobody is condoning that behaviour.

Ineverwannabelikeyou · 10/11/2022 20:11

But it does work like that for some people..

Onlyforcake · 10/11/2022 20:20

Obviously not. But then I've not met a guy who left his wife who asked for 50/50 either. Maybe there's something wrong with the low expectations of men as parents or women too high? Either way. I am faitly sure men as RP are a minority? Or are you denying that?

Ineverwannabelikeyou · 10/11/2022 20:26

Onlyforcake · 10/11/2022 20:20

Obviously not. But then I've not met a guy who left his wife who asked for 50/50 either. Maybe there's something wrong with the low expectations of men as parents or women too high? Either way. I am faitly sure men as RP are a minority? Or are you denying that?

I've met quite a few! Weird.

I certainly don't have low expectations of men, either.

I haven't said men as RP are a majority - I'm not even sure this is aimed at me sorry Blush

New posts on this thread. Refresh page