People who have mortgages are not rich.
Average homeowner is a minimum 40x richer than average renter
In a society everyone is meant to get help when they need it.
Except the average renter it seems as the Lib Dems excluded them. So their taxes go in the pot, and help…..homeowners! That’s a reverse Robin Hood.
baffling why you're so furious at the mere suggestion that people who live in partially owned houses might require a tiny bit of help
Because it’s queue jumping ahead of those who are in more need at their expense. Telling that you think £300/mo is “a tiny bit of help”
On one hand you are furious about people having to rent forever,
Yes but not just that, rent forever and have to contribute to others owning a home.
Your comment shows that you have absolutely no idea. Many people's mortgages are increasing by £1000+ per month. and
had to borrow large mortgages just to buy a modest home where they live.
BBC calculator says you’d need a mortgage loan debt of £475k to drive a £1k/mo mortgage increase if interest rate went from 2% to 6%. That means a home of at least £525k. They’d also need a minimum income of £105k/yr assuming no debts. Which puts them at a minimum in the top 10% for household income. Also not that modest of a home (see below).
you seem equally furious about those who have just managed to escape that and buy a house but with a huge LTV % so are paying large mortgages.
Average FTB mortgage loan debt is £185k which would drive a monthly increase of £389/mo. The average mortgage amount held per household is only £58k, which would drive a much lower monthly increase.
So, no people facing £1k/mo mortgage increases most likely haven’t “just escaped” renting. And as they’d be in the top 10% (or higher!), they’re quite wealthy and I am baffled about how they have more need than renters who usually are in the bottom 20%?
Is your reaction to most things rage?
No