DS is 3 and at pre school.
He struggles with language and behaviour. He's a late May baby so not super late but on the young end. Because he's a little behind and he's younger than lots of his peers...he feels at a completely different stage to some of them...particularly the girls who seem able to sit and do an activity for 30 mins, talk in whole and complex sentences etc. They'll be doing some art while my DS is sitting next to them with the glue stick in his mouth.
I'm not being rude about my DS. I will defend and support him above all else. I just recognise at this age he still seems like a toddler whereas a lot of his peers are like proper school kids.
He doesn't have to start primary until he's 5 if I've understood correctly. So even though he'd be down to start Sep 23, is there any value in keeping him on nursery/pre school for another year and then he'll be 5 at start and turn 6 on the summer term.
Why don't more parents do this? Surely it can be really helpful for kids who still seem very young in temperament and language etc to not start school before they have to?
Would be really interested in any views
(Ps it is possible he's neurodiverse, DH is heavily dyslexic, and DS speech and language person actually mentioned autism but we not having a lot of luck down that path. We shall wait and of course get him any extra help he needs)