Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder why benefits should rise in line with inflation when no job is?

409 replies

Bananil · 05/10/2022 22:22

Massively struggling with food prices and absolutely no chance the heating is going on for a long time yet. DH and I work full time but have not had a pay rise since before the pandemic and wouldn’t ask for one as our industry has taken a real hit. I can’t think of any jobs that are expecting a pay rise in line with inflation so why do much fuss about making sure benefits do?

OP posts:
ClaudineClare · 06/10/2022 08:09

If they changed benefits system, allowed a set amount of time to find work (for those able) before stopping it, do you think it would work?

And then what? Do we leave people to starve? That will up the crime figures nicely as desperate people turn to burglary and mugging. Or maybe we could have workhouses. Or euthanasia for the long term unemployed.

lannistunut · 06/10/2022 08:11

ClocksGoingBackwards · 06/10/2022 08:04

I agree with the OP that it seems wrong to raise benefits in line with inflation when wages don’t do the same.

Disability benefits should be higher to start with and should rise in line with inflation, but other working age benefits need to be difficult to live on to provide an incentive to work.

We should be able to expect more out of a life of full time work than we should out of a life on benefits, but that’s not how it works right now. People feel entitled to the same standard of living as working people no matter how little they do to provide for themselves and that needs to change, especially at a time when the country has more employment opportunities than it has healthy unemployed people.

There is so much wrong with this, it is hard to know where to start. Misinformation about benefits has been fed to people for years.

Are you happy for people on benefits to die in greater numbers than they would if their benefits were uprated in line with inflation? Because that is what is expected to happen this year - that is why many Tories are in favour of uprating in line with inflation.

Your views are at the extreme right-wing on this issue and you are entitled to that but when Tory Ministers are to the left of you, you have to own your politics - your views are genuinely disgusting to me as they are based on things made up to turn the working poor against those on benefits.

I would urge everyone to read sources like the Resolution Foundation and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation to hear the other side of the issue.

TheFairyCaravan · 06/10/2022 08:13

I see someone has left the gate open at the cunt farm again...

There's so much bullshit on this thread it's unbelievable/. People who are on benefits don't have a better life than those who are in work. The vast majority of people claiming UC are in work. Pensioners receive the most in benefits.

I get PIP. I can't work because of my disabilities. I'd love to be able to, but I can't. I live a very lonely life in a lot of pain, unable to do the simplest of tasks. I have an adapted cat so in theory I can go out, but that rarely happens. My husband works, he's always worked. There's times when I've been left in very dangerous situations so he could continue working. He's had a substantial pay rise this year and will be getting a bonus at Christmas.

If life on benefits is so great then maybe people would like to swap with some of us disabled people, or some carers who get less than £70 a week, or some families who have bills larger than what they receive on UC?

The problem in this country isn't the people on benefits, it's the people at the top, hence why everything when tits up when the Govt announced the 45% tax cut. Look up, instead of down, because that's where the real problems are.

ClaudineClare · 06/10/2022 08:13

If your not getting a fair pay deal then fight against it

Yes, exactly. But no, people will prefer the poor and vulnerable are mistreated and blamed. Which is exactly how the government likes it.

lannistunut · 06/10/2022 08:13

RamsayEaster · 06/10/2022 08:03

I generally don’t think OP was meaning benefits should not increase for those who can’t work due to medical reasons / carer / single parent etc they shouldn’t increase for people who chose not to work even though they can

People who choose not to work even though they can are already sanctioned.

Do you know what someone on 'the dole' is required to do in 2022? No, thought not. Just spouting bollocks.

ZaZathecat · 06/10/2022 08:14

Many people in work rely on benefits to top them up in order to live. Yes, wages should go up to stop this being the case, as well as benefits needing to increase.

YomAsalYomBasal · 06/10/2022 08:14

As above, you can have my £70 a week carers allowance if you'll do the 24/7 care my child needs. And it really is 24/7, I don't sleep for more than 2 hours at a time. If I stop caring for her she needs a specialist nursing placement that would cost the state over £100k a year. Carers save the public purse so much money, that's why we should make sure they can at least eat.

Miajk · 06/10/2022 08:16

Oldsu · 05/10/2022 23:23

@SarasandmanYes you are correct most CONTRIBUTION based benefits go to pensioners and you do realise that pensioners also pay tax, I am a working pensioner the extra tax I pay (over and above the tax and NI combined I paid when I was working age) equates to a weeks pension every 4 weeks, a pension that I paid NI for the best part of 51 years before I qualified for it, even when I stop work I will still be paying tax.

This is a genuine question, but isn't it weird that the current generations are paying for pensioners (state pension)?

Cost of living and everything has been going up steadily while wages have been stagnant. Especially things like housing.

Older generations were able to save, buy a home at a reasonable proportion to their salary, etc. so why have so many of them not saved for retirement? I'm not from the UK so beyond interest rates in the 70s and recessions I'm not familiar with how different generations were off financially, and I genuinely don't mean offense. Did people get screwed over with their pensions back then? As I also thought many In that generation would be on a final salary pension, which younger people have missed out on.

lannistunut · 06/10/2022 08:20

I think in these awful times, when people quite a long way up the income scale are starting to worry about their bills and their futures, if you are the sort of person who looks at someone worse off than you financially and says I want them to struggle even more then you are a total cock. Therapy might help, but you are probably too far gone into the land of bitter bastards.

I'm really worried about my own finances, but I can see those with less than me are going to struggle more and my natural human instinct is to want people to be OK.

Quveas · 06/10/2022 08:20

I suspect this is just a goady post, but if the OP really thinks that they can live on benefits, they should perhaps try it.

JocelynBurnell · 06/10/2022 08:26

I can’t think of any jobs that are expecting a pay rise in line with inflation so why do much fuss about making sure benefits do?

So lets all accept a lower standard of living but we will only happily do so if the very poorest in society freeze and starve first?

happyinherts · 06/10/2022 08:28

I think people are twisting the point of the OP's original statement.

I don't think she is criticising benefit rises or begrugding anyone anything. Her point is that the working poor are never listened to.

To those who say the working poor can claim UC, they're poor after their deductions which are not taken into account. My daughter's travel to work (£90), tax, NI, pension and student loan amount to £200 per week. That's £10K per year she doesn't see. Fair enough - but it brings her to a take home level which is less than I've seen quoted for UC.

FOTTFSOFTFOASM · 06/10/2022 08:32

@Bananil I agree with you. However, you will never, ever get away with saying anything like this on MN because, like the NHS, 'defending people on benefits' is a quasi religion here.

YoSofi · 06/10/2022 08:32

happyinherts · 06/10/2022 08:28

I think people are twisting the point of the OP's original statement.

I don't think she is criticising benefit rises or begrugding anyone anything. Her point is that the working poor are never listened to.

To those who say the working poor can claim UC, they're poor after their deductions which are not taken into account. My daughter's travel to work (£90), tax, NI, pension and student loan amount to £200 per week. That's £10K per year she doesn't see. Fair enough - but it brings her to a take home level which is less than I've seen quoted for UC.

And so the answer is to not increase benefits in line with inflation?

Or is it that your daughter should look at her employer and start asking questions?

Twiglets1 · 06/10/2022 08:33

happyinherts · 06/10/2022 08:28

I think people are twisting the point of the OP's original statement.

I don't think she is criticising benefit rises or begrugding anyone anything. Her point is that the working poor are never listened to.

To those who say the working poor can claim UC, they're poor after their deductions which are not taken into account. My daughter's travel to work (£90), tax, NI, pension and student loan amount to £200 per week. That's £10K per year she doesn't see. Fair enough - but it brings her to a take home level which is less than I've seen quoted for UC.

I agree with this and think people are piling in on the OP a bit too much. If you look at her poll results on page 1 it is clear that over 40% of people reading her statement agree with her so the issue of whether she raises a valid point is not as clear cut as some people seem to think.

Sirzy · 06/10/2022 08:33

happyinherts · 06/10/2022 08:28

I think people are twisting the point of the OP's original statement.

I don't think she is criticising benefit rises or begrugding anyone anything. Her point is that the working poor are never listened to.

To those who say the working poor can claim UC, they're poor after their deductions which are not taken into account. My daughter's travel to work (£90), tax, NI, pension and student loan amount to £200 per week. That's £10K per year she doesn't see. Fair enough - but it brings her to a take home level which is less than I've seen quoted for UC.

And what in there means it’s ok to leave people on much less struggling then?

Sirzy · 06/10/2022 08:34

lannistunut · 06/10/2022 08:20

I think in these awful times, when people quite a long way up the income scale are starting to worry about their bills and their futures, if you are the sort of person who looks at someone worse off than you financially and says I want them to struggle even more then you are a total cock. Therapy might help, but you are probably too far gone into the land of bitter bastards.

I'm really worried about my own finances, but I can see those with less than me are going to struggle more and my natural human instinct is to want people to be OK.

Perfectly put

waffless · 06/10/2022 08:34

Do not even go that route OP. In this country whoever questions anything about the benefits system better move away. I personally thing the system needs a proper shake up. With only disabled, carers and people who loose their jobs for a certain period receiving it. People should be paid enough to live without tax credits. However, this unsustainable situation can only get worse as nobody in government would dare to have a honest conversation. The people once in benefits need to have them raise with the inflation. Otherwise, they would be extremely poor which is pointless. Less people on benefits and raise the amount for those in the system to have a good standard of life. Pensioners are receiving back what they put in so they should still get protection.

lannistunut · 06/10/2022 08:35

happyinherts · 06/10/2022 08:28

I think people are twisting the point of the OP's original statement.

I don't think she is criticising benefit rises or begrugding anyone anything. Her point is that the working poor are never listened to.

To those who say the working poor can claim UC, they're poor after their deductions which are not taken into account. My daughter's travel to work (£90), tax, NI, pension and student loan amount to £200 per week. That's £10K per year she doesn't see. Fair enough - but it brings her to a take home level which is less than I've seen quoted for UC.

No, I don't think so. The OP started a goady thread and fucked off. It is yet another benefits attack IMO.

We can all find people in any category who are having a hard time. It is a universal cost of living crisis and the government is doing too little - and has done too little for the last 12 years since they decided to cut all the support that used to be there, both for individuals and for services.

Your daughter's issues are worsened by the high costs of student loans and the high cost of transport in this country - both political choices made by the Tories.

But your DD's issues do not change the fact that benefits should rise in line with inflation.

whowhatwerewhy · 06/10/2022 08:36

@happyinherts
I have to agree, I think there is a section of society who are being overlooked.

W00p · 06/10/2022 08:37

Why wouldn't you ask for a pay rise? You sell your labour for money right? Or do you go to work to keep yourself occupied despite being a multi millionaire? You're worth a lot more than you think you are.

womaninatightspot · 06/10/2022 08:39

Labraradabrador · 05/10/2022 23:00

If you earn enough to be a net contributor, then you can afford to help those who are vulnerable
^^
Happy to help those that are truly vulnerable, but far too many receive state support. HALF of UK households receive benefits? The sense of entitlement is baffling. In order for the economy to thrive, surely we need more people contributing?

A lot of people receive benefits simply due to the high cost of childcare and/or rent. They pay tax/ni.

I think what we’ve needed as a country for a long time is an increase in social housing and subsidised childcare. Many European countries provide subsidised childcare enabling both parents to work. Expensive in the short term worthwhile in the long term

lannistunut · 06/10/2022 08:40

whowhatwerewhy · 06/10/2022 08:36

@happyinherts
I have to agree, I think there is a section of society who are being overlooked.

Under this government, a whole host of groups are being overlooked! Don't fall into to the trap of looking at someone else with fuck all and squabbling with them.

If you are a Tory, be proud of it. But if you are not a Tory don't fall for this again.

We are ALMOST ALL being overlooked, except for home-owning pensioners and the rich i.e. core Tory voters.

happyinherts · 06/10/2022 08:40

@YoSofi and Sirzy

You're both missing my point

Sirzy - I have never 'benefit bashed.' I've NEVER said it's okay to leave people struggling. Please point out where I have.

YoSoFI - My daughter's employer doesn't pay a bad wage. He has to raise a certain amount of turnover to be able to pay staff, and of course that's never guaranteed. Plus, he doesn't care - and why should he - that staff pay £90 a week to get there. My point is that the government take, take, take off this section of the community until there's nothing left. They're left below UC levels and cannot claim.

Nowhere have I begrudged benefit claimants their money.

FridayTheThirteeth · 06/10/2022 08:41

Many on benefits struggle but some don't and do get all the various extra add ons. If you are on tax credits with a child with ADHD and get DLA for child, then carers allowance, then disability extra on Tax credit and working tax credit if one works over 16 hours you would be surprised how much you get - friend shared with me.

However, many do not get those add ons.

Swipe left for the next trending thread