Looked after ex husband's dog for two weeks (also DD's dad) whilst he was away on holiday with DD and his wife and their kids. For free obviously, just asked for his food and bed.
Anyway he's pissed because I've not walked him much.
I had every intention of doing so but he is TERRIBLE on the lead. Yanking and pulling the whole time and frankly I just grew tired of trying so he's only been on a walk a few times whilst here. He's had the run of my large garden the rest of the time. He's seemed happy enough. I WFH so never really been on his own.
I know it's not ideal but it hasn't done him any harm and it was a favour. I just feel like saying train your flipping dog if you want other people to walk them!
AIBU?
If someone looks after your dog for free is it reasonable to complain about something?
AnotherDoggy1 · 02/09/2022 17:54
Am I being unreasonable?
493 votes. Final results.
POLLTulipomania · 02/09/2022 20:55
Sounds like a large dog, and the run of a large garden isn't enough exercise for a dog of that age and size. If you couldn't meet it's needs, you should not have offered to look after it.
AnotherDoggy1 · 02/09/2022 21:11
I was more than happy to meet his needs until I realised what a frigging nightmare he is on the lead. In my opinion if you're going to be expecting walks from whomever is looking after your dog then you should disclose beforehand that they have a problem on lead, then that person can say whether or not they can commit to that.
So in the PPs example of the grandparent not taking the DD swimming (I mean it's hardly the same anyway because HE ASKED me, I didn't offer like PPs mother did but anyway)... If you failed to disclose beforehand that your daughter kicks and screams and hates going swimming then she'd probably have been within her rights to not bother taking her!
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
Scianel · 02/09/2022 21:23
It's complete nonsense that a dog is not having it's basic needs met by not being walked frequently for a temporary time period.
In many countries dogs live on the street, or chained up outside. It's absolute nonsense claiming that this dog's basic needs were neglected by comparison. Has it come to any harm? No.
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.