Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Should hospitality be furloughed again this winter?

145 replies

User135644 · 30/08/2022 17:04

The energy crisis is going to be catastrophic and there's no cap for businesses. If we do nothing basically the vast majority will be forced to shut and then we've got support people with benefits etc and less tax revenue.

Given people are already going to be hard up, could we just furlough all the pubs and restaurants for the winter while we try to work out a solution to this madness? I'd hate to see all the pubs shut for good otherwise.

OP posts:
GoneWithTheWine1 · 30/08/2022 17:05

😂 and whose going to pay for the furlough?!

ClocksGoingBackwards · 30/08/2022 17:05

No.

CiderWithLizzie · 30/08/2022 17:06

No

edwinbear · 30/08/2022 17:06

I feel for them, but the reality is we can't afford to, so no.

DreamingofItaly2023 · 30/08/2022 17:07

Absolutely not. If the government does want to spend tens of millions then it can help with energy bills rather than furlough.

ItsSnowJokes · 30/08/2022 17:07

I was all for the furlough scheme the first time around but no they should not this year. It doesn't help the business. Millions and millions of people are fucked with the cost of living crisis. Fuoughing people won't help this.

DenholmElliot1 · 30/08/2022 17:07

Um, we haven't finished paying for the last lot of furlough yet

TigerRag · 30/08/2022 17:07

Using what money from where?

User135644 · 30/08/2022 17:08

GoneWithTheWine1 · 30/08/2022 17:05

😂 and whose going to pay for the furlough?!

Who's going to pay the benefits bill for all the lost jobs?

OP posts:
ofwarren · 30/08/2022 17:08

With what money?

Sunnyqueen · 30/08/2022 17:08

Err no. Big looming energy crisis is what needs financial assistance.

ItsSnowJokes · 30/08/2022 17:09

User135644 · 30/08/2022 17:08

Who's going to pay the benefits bill for all the lost jobs?

Thats cheaper than furlough!

User135644 · 30/08/2022 17:09

TigerRag · 30/08/2022 17:07

Using what money from where?

We're paying 100 billion and rising for HS2.

OP posts:
titchy · 30/08/2022 17:10

Wouldn't it be better to use the money you propose to use for furlough to help businesses with their energy bills?

User135644 · 30/08/2022 17:11

ItsSnowJokes · 30/08/2022 17:09

Thats cheaper than furlough!

Where will the revenues come from when everything has closed and gone?

OP posts:
Owlsinmybedroom · 30/08/2022 17:12

No, that would not work, the money has to come from somewhere and if doesn't come from a business making money then it comes from the general public who on average don't have the money to support this either.

What would be more helpful was making it that the energy companies couldn't make such massive profits off energy consumption. Scottish power for example have made £925m profit in the first half of the year alone and they are small change compared to some of the energy companies.

That's where part of the problem lies.

Making staff exist on 80% of their pay, stopping people from being able to eat out, having a knock on impact on the industries surrounding hospitality like food suppliers, cleaning agencies etc, and the making the public pay for it is just adding insult to injury.

Fix the problem where the problem lies.

And stop the government from scaling back greener energy sources. That way we would be future proofing against future supply issues so that we don't end up in the same place again.

Anonymous48 · 30/08/2022 17:14

"the vast majority will be forced to shut"

I think you're being a bit overdramatic here.

Deliaskis · 30/08/2022 17:15

No, it isn't remotely an appropriate mechanism at all and would make a lot of things worse. We need to find a solution for the actual energy crisis, not pay businesses to stay closed and people to not work. It makes no sense.

chillipenguin · 30/08/2022 17:16

No. A lot of them need christmas trade to survive

luxxlisbon · 30/08/2022 17:17

Who's going to pay the benefits bill for all the lost jobs?

Well benefits would be a hell of a lot cheaper than furlough so I’m not really sure what your argument here is.

WaltzingWaters · 30/08/2022 17:17

Deliaskis · 30/08/2022 17:15

No, it isn't remotely an appropriate mechanism at all and would make a lot of things worse. We need to find a solution for the actual energy crisis, not pay businesses to stay closed and people to not work. It makes no sense.

This. Definitely not a solution. The solution needs to be focused on the actual problem.

Nidan2Sandan · 30/08/2022 17:18

Are you mad?

Furlough has financially crippled this country. It should never have been continued past summer of 2020 as it is.

Being paid benefits whilst looking for work is one thing, paying employed people to sit & bake banana bread for months on end is another.

Metabigot · 30/08/2022 17:19

Yes let's give that magic money tree another shake!

What's the national debt now? Eleventy gazillion willion?

forgut · 30/08/2022 17:19

I wonder if the cost of businesses going out of business & the impact of that on unemployment is higher or lower than furlough?

abovedecknotbelow · 30/08/2022 17:19

No.