Thinking briefs are sexier than boxer shorts???

[Floogal]

I don't mean baggy y fronts. More like the smaller Speedo type pants. You see more thigh, can see the bulge and arse outline. Boxers just hide everything and have low sex appeal

Surely the wrapping depends on what it’s packing?

Not for me, don't care what he looks like or how nice the body is, briefs are a no go. Those two examples upthread are 🤮

I prefer budgie smugglers to shorts in swimwear actually. More European less American. Braver and more self confident.
I like beliefs too although aside from my son in primary I can’t ever remember seeing a man in them ever.

🤣🤣🤣

No.

My ex turned up in a pair of briefs once and I must admit I did like them as a change. But then his trunks were always a bit baggy around the bum so the briefs were a better fit generally. If he’d had decent trunks or a decent bum they’d have looked better.

DH does have nice legs and bum.

Try Googling backless briefs, if you dare.

It seems my last post killed the thread, at least temporarily. I apologise. But, speaking as a man (because I am), I can tell you now that comfort is everything. FWIW, traditional boxer shorts that provide no scrotal or penile support are useless and highly uncomfortable as an undergarment. Something that cannot be said about briefs, be they slips, Y-fronts or backless. I have NOT worn the latter. Boxer briefs are essentially briefs but a little longer in the leg. They, and regular briefs, are my choice, whatever anybody else thinks, man or woman. If any man wears a thong, God forbid, I do not want to hear about it.

I think people are mixing up
oPs description of briefs with fitted boxers?

Baggy boxers are