Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Aibu to not want a £15 minimum wage?

663 replies

Israisingwagesworthit · 24/08/2022 09:30

This morning I saw a post saying there are calls for a £15 per hour minimum wage.

I understand fully that the current minimum wage doesn't give people enough to survive on and something needs to change to ensure everyone gets a comfortable living wage, and I support this.

However by pushing up the minimum wage doesn't that just add additional costs for businesses, therefore increase costs to consumers removing any benefit of an increased minimum wage in addition to reducing the disposable income and pay gap of anyone above minimum wage.

Surely this only benefits the government with additional income tax?

Is this the best option in a time of potential 18% inflation, would this not increase it further?

Capitalism is the issue, rather than sharing the profit wealth, CEO's (of all levels of business, small and large) keep the profits for themselves and just raise prices when costs go up.

Am i being unreasonable to assume that in order for the £15ph wage to be successful, companies must accept lower profits rather than increasing prices in line with the wage increase otherwise its just pointless and daminging to all wage earners not just the minimum wage.

Won't the government have to threaten windfall taxes to those who increase prices to maintain profits to make it work and to actually benefit minimum wage earners?

I'll admit I'm a middle earner (£40k) civil servant (so no chance of a payrise anytime soon) so would be financially damaged by a raise in minimum wage if nothing is done to stop the subsequently price increases of products after a minimum pay rise. As a result my view may be biased, but am I wrong?

OP posts:
Badbadbunny · 24/08/2022 14:11

AStar98 · 24/08/2022 13:29

Perhaps increasing the tax & NI threshold for those on NMW would give low earners a bit of extra in their take home pay.
Not completely taking FT out of paying tax & NI at all but would certainly help not add to the spiralling cost of living.

That's exactly what has been happening. No tax nor NIC on earnings up to £12,570, which is a whopping increase in the thresholds over the past decade or so.

dianthus101 · 24/08/2022 14:11

TPL · 24/08/2022 14:06

It is definitely not fair to assume minimum wage = minimum stress. There are cases where that fits but also higher paid jobs that aren't stressful.

I worked for a retailer that had a sister shop in the same shopping centre. The company were very very slow at hiring new staff as it was done by head office rather than through the shop manager. This led to the manager of the sister shop working very long hours with very little time off. The only break he got most days was when one of us in our shop covered him for a short break usually 15/20 minutes. The rest of the time he had to be out on the shop flooring dealing with every single customer on his own for 9 and a half hours with no help. He ended up so stressed that he ended up extremely unwell and had to go on sickness benefits.

Technically he didn't earn minimum wage but as he had a low salaried wage it worked out as minimum wage due to all the hours the company expected salaried managers to work.

I also had a colleague who went on sickness leave due to the stress. The irony is the company is a well known health shop.

That sounds physically stressful but ultimately he didn't have to go home and worry about whether his mistake harmed or killed anyone did he?

Bluesky2507 · 24/08/2022 14:11

@Alexandra2001 teachers weren't needed in lockdown?! What about the teachers that went into school still to look after the vulnerable children and children of key workers? Schools didn't close. And what about all the other teachers planning and delivering lessons over zoom to children at home? People have a short memory.

MarshaBradyo · 24/08/2022 14:11

JustALittleHelpPlease · 24/08/2022 14:07

Can we just address the minimum wage rise = more money to spend = higher inflation fallacy quickly?

As it stands, (simple numbers to make it easy to follow) for the sake of argument, it costs around £15 per hour to cover the costs of living, that is to pay bills, get to work, put food on the table. Currently around £10 of that is earned and £5 comes from benefits or getting into debt.

If you make it £15 from earned income then nothing will come from benefits.

The worker has the same money, no extra to spend anywhere.

The benefit system gains £5 per hour. This does not get spent on latte and cake, it gets spent on other areas of public spending.

INCREASED MINIMUM WAGE DOES NOT INCREASE MONEY BEING SPENT IN THE ECONOMY it does not contribute to a wage spiral in and of itself.

Yes there are many other issues but I thought it might help to lay it out.

Isn’t this only half the equation?

The higher wage pushes up prices for the business which causes inflation

beachcitygirl · 24/08/2022 14:12

I didn't suggest they opt out in fact I said it was foolish to opt out but min wage workers have the same worries & needs.

I've also said teachers deserve higher salaries.

but neither you nor anyone has said why they need a higher salary ONLY & BECAUSE workers on min wage having their salary raised.

The whole package of teaching is better than those of supermarket workers. And yes as I've said that includes, status, holidays, employers contributions, self respect, not having to go out to work weekends and Christmas Day etc

I find all these professional people on here professing that they will work in supermarkets if the wage is £15 an hour utterly laughable, if it wasn't so Sneery & horrible.

But as I said earlier on for those who just need to "feel better" than someone else.. there's nothing else to say.

Badbadbunny · 24/08/2022 14:12

JustALittleHelpPlease · 24/08/2022 14:07

Can we just address the minimum wage rise = more money to spend = higher inflation fallacy quickly?

As it stands, (simple numbers to make it easy to follow) for the sake of argument, it costs around £15 per hour to cover the costs of living, that is to pay bills, get to work, put food on the table. Currently around £10 of that is earned and £5 comes from benefits or getting into debt.

If you make it £15 from earned income then nothing will come from benefits.

The worker has the same money, no extra to spend anywhere.

The benefit system gains £5 per hour. This does not get spent on latte and cake, it gets spent on other areas of public spending.

INCREASED MINIMUM WAGE DOES NOT INCREASE MONEY BEING SPENT IN THE ECONOMY it does not contribute to a wage spiral in and of itself.

Yes there are many other issues but I thought it might help to lay it out.

You're missing the reduced corporation tax income to the Govt, from the reduced business profits because they're now paying 50% higher wages, so any saving in benefits will be outweighed by lost tax revenue!

Closetbeanmuncher · 24/08/2022 14:14

We simply cannot keep getting tax payers to subsidise the profits of large profitable companies

Amen to that!

gnilliwdog · 24/08/2022 14:15

Many professionals including healthcare professionals don't sit down all day and work unsocial hours too. On top of that they get a lot of responsibility and stress. You are deluded if you don't think any of them would swap for a “boring job” with no responsibility but the same pay.

I don't think I am deluded. Menial work means working just to pay the bills - there's little respect or status, and the repetition of the same task over and over. There's a physical and mental toll - not because you are saving lives but because you are flipping burgers. You really think humans would prefer doing something meaningless 40-70 hours per week for 50 years because it pays the same as saving lives? That's quite cynical.

missbunnyrabbit · 24/08/2022 14:17

beachcitygirl · 24/08/2022 12:46

And of course you need to feel better than other people...
Working in a supermarket is a far far far tougher gig than teaching. Most looked down on careers are.

And the prize for the stupidest reply goes to....

I worked in a supermarket for 4 years. I have been a teacher for 3. I would LOVE to go back to the supermarket, if it was paid the same. It was easy and carefree.

PrivateHall · 24/08/2022 14:18

WhileMyGuitarGentlyWeeps · 24/08/2022 11:11

I do have to laugh at the 'why will people aspire to become nurses and teachers and police, when they can work in a supermarket or factory for the same wage?' line people are trotting out. And here's me thinking people went into these 'caring' professions for the love of the job. Clearly not LMFAO!

And God forbid someone slogging their arse off in a factory doing backbreaking work, (and doing anti-social, tiring shifts,) or sitting at a supermarket checkout with very few breaks, (and stacking the shelves and doing the dotcom orders when the checkouts slow down,) gets paid the SAME as the nurses, police, and teachers. I mean they couldn't POSSIBLY work as hard COULD they? Hmm

We really need to get past this mindset that only the 'professionals' in 'public service roles work hard. It's untrue, and a fucking insult to hard working people doing manual labour, who didn't have the same opportunities as them to get a university degree! (Or were not quite 'academic' enough.)

As for the people saying 'I am a nurse/police officer/teacher, and if I could get paid the same for working in a supermarket, or working in a factory, I would leave today;' if you're so stressed in your job, then leave. What's stopping you? If it's that you need the salary you're on, then change a few priorities in your life. Downsize your home, have fewer luxuries, have the same lifestyle as the lower earners. You seem to think it's OK for others to earn less, so why not you? Why are you staying in your 'hugely stressful' jobs? Just leave and take one of the lower paid jobs that you consider to be much easier!

And as I said, I was clearly wrong about people being in these professions for the love of the job. How sad. Sad

OK lets take nurses as an example. If nurses get paid minimum wage of £15 per hour, they will be paying back student debt and therefore their take home pay will be less than someone working in a job that requires no skills, qualifications or experience. This will continue until they move up the scale enough which will take years (student loan repayments are really quite high). You really can't see why this would be unappealing? Of course people go into nursing for vocational reasons, but actually it is pay that tends to keep people there as the realities of the horrendous working conditions come to light. Many nurses find it hard to move on into another role with similar pay, so are stuck. Putting them on minimum wage certainly removes that problem, so good good luck retaining any nurses.

takealettermsjones · 24/08/2022 14:19

You really think humans would prefer doing something meaningless 40-70 hours per week for 50 years because it pays the same as saving lives?

Some of those who have already done the latter would, yes. Because the pleasant notion of "saving lives" doesn't mitigate the stress, fear, burnout, compassion fatigue, exhaustion, etc.

BarryBantam · 24/08/2022 14:19

JustALittleHelpPlease · 24/08/2022 14:07

Can we just address the minimum wage rise = more money to spend = higher inflation fallacy quickly?

As it stands, (simple numbers to make it easy to follow) for the sake of argument, it costs around £15 per hour to cover the costs of living, that is to pay bills, get to work, put food on the table. Currently around £10 of that is earned and £5 comes from benefits or getting into debt.

If you make it £15 from earned income then nothing will come from benefits.

The worker has the same money, no extra to spend anywhere.

The benefit system gains £5 per hour. This does not get spent on latte and cake, it gets spent on other areas of public spending.

INCREASED MINIMUM WAGE DOES NOT INCREASE MONEY BEING SPENT IN THE ECONOMY it does not contribute to a wage spiral in and of itself.

Yes there are many other issues but I thought it might help to lay it out.

Exactly.

Plus we have a massive productivity problem rn. Businesses would do well to be plugging that which will also avert any potential inflationary spiral.

And ofc the very best way to get inflation under control is to stop printing money.

Do both of those things and increase wages and to there's a good chance of getting out of this with less pain.

Or keep wages as they are (ie depressed), keep printing money, keep throwing state benefits at working people and watch as we spiral into a winter of actual physical hardship for the lowest four income deciles while executive pay and asset acquisition skyrockets.

justasking111 · 24/08/2022 14:19

If £15 is the bottom of the heap, waitress say, then head waitress, restaurant manager will expect £2ph more minimum because of their responsibility

Pot washer £15 then anyone above this menial back break-in job will expect more

Teaching assistant £15 per hour, then what are teachers worth

Hospital cleaner £15 ph what's a porter, nurse worth

The solution would be to put most people on £15 per hour. We'd level up then.

dianthus101 · 24/08/2022 14:19

JustALittleHelpPlease · 24/08/2022 14:07

Can we just address the minimum wage rise = more money to spend = higher inflation fallacy quickly?

As it stands, (simple numbers to make it easy to follow) for the sake of argument, it costs around £15 per hour to cover the costs of living, that is to pay bills, get to work, put food on the table. Currently around £10 of that is earned and £5 comes from benefits or getting into debt.

If you make it £15 from earned income then nothing will come from benefits.

The worker has the same money, no extra to spend anywhere.

The benefit system gains £5 per hour. This does not get spent on latte and cake, it gets spent on other areas of public spending.

INCREASED MINIMUM WAGE DOES NOT INCREASE MONEY BEING SPENT IN THE ECONOMY it does not contribute to a wage spiral in and of itself.

Yes there are many other issues but I thought it might help to lay it out.

Of course it would cause a wage spiral. It would not only be the people who are currently on minimum wage who need a wage increase. Anyone currently on less than £15 would need a pay rise. Many on a bit more than £15 would expect a pay rise too or you would get managers receiving the same amount as their staff. Many of those people including those currently on minimum wage are not receiving benefits. Not everyone minimum wage is in in debt. Not everyone in debt is on minimum wage.

Winceybincey · 24/08/2022 14:20

Minimum wage is no where near enough to live even a basic life in this current climate. And as you’ve pointed out, other salaries would also need to increase otherwise, people who’ve studied for years, worked hard and sacrificed so much to gain a qualification in a skilled sector will be demoralised earning the same amount as a supermarket assistant. My kids need their teachers, we need our doctors and businesses need managers.

But, I also don’t think it’s fair that CEOs get the slack that they do. They’re not all multi-millionaires. If they can’t take a good amount of profit then what’s the point in doing what they do? I don’t think many understand the work and sacrifice that goes into to starting up a business, ploughing savings into it that could be lost, getting the work in, getting the right candidates, keeping it afloat so everyone still has a job by the end of the year, making sure all legislation is followed and accounts up to date. My husband works 7 days a week, days, evenings and weekends. He’s missed out on so much of our young children, and we’ve missed out on him. He worries day and night incase contracts end unexpectedly and his staff won’t have work. He’s out there marketing his business to get more contracts on top of the nitty gritty of the job. He pays the staff above minimum wage, they do the job Monday to Friday and then go home to their families, leaving work at work. My husband doesn’t get to do that, so it’s not true that it’s just the staff that make all the money whilst the CEOs sit back and hoard it all.

If minimum wage went up to £15 an hour and it had to come out of the profits then they’d be no point in him working his fingers, brain and heart to the bone and he’ll close. His staff will then have no work, never mind a wage increase.

but, what he does do is offer his staff free courses. If they do the courses and gain experience he will put them forward for the more responsible and better paid roles rather than advertising externally to fill them. His staff aren’t interested though, they just want to do their job and go home which is fair enough - if they’re happy on their current wage, most are not though which is ironic.

I agree with a previous poster that workers should be encouraged to better themselves, gain skills and the confidence to aim higher. There are highly paid jobs out there but it’s hard work that people need to be willing to do. As a single mum many years ago I worked my minimum wage 40 hour a week job and studied at home during evenings and weekends. Yes me and my child missed out on much quality time together, but it takes sacrifice to create a better life on top of the actual work.

dianthus101 · 24/08/2022 14:22

takealettermsjones · 24/08/2022 14:19

You really think humans would prefer doing something meaningless 40-70 hours per week for 50 years because it pays the same as saving lives?

Some of those who have already done the latter would, yes. Because the pleasant notion of "saving lives" doesn't mitigate the stress, fear, burnout, compassion fatigue, exhaustion, etc.

Having done a job that saves lives, I agree. I wouldn't have felt like that at the start of my career, but after a few years the responsibility wears you down.

beachcitygirl · 24/08/2022 14:23

@missbunnyrabbit wins the award for the stupidest most lacking of empathy & most ignorant poster on this thread.

YOUR minimum wage easy peasy fun supermarket job was a temporary role which you were able to leave behind as you were off to bigger & better things.

It was NOT your life.

Grow some
Empathy & decency.

Anothernamechangeplease · 24/08/2022 14:24

beachcitygirl · 24/08/2022 13:46

@Anothernamechangeplease

Or
You could reduce your dividends or freeze top level salaries.

Or

If you can't afford to live on your own salary/profit if you pay your staff £15 then maybe your business isn't viable.

We are not for profit, so we don't pay dividends and we don't pay huge salaries to senior management.

We are a charity that helps some of the most vulnerable in our society. Maybe we're not viable if we can't afford to pay all of our staff £15 an hour or more, but if we stop operating, a whole lot of vulnerable people will suffer. And the taxpayer will have to pick up the tab.

RamblingEclectic · 24/08/2022 14:25

In 10 years time there won't be a need for fruit pickers, or shelf stickers, or warehouse workers, it will all be automated with few people managing the machines.

People have been saying that for 30+ years. We might have moved closer to that, but especially with fruit picking, there are so many more tech hurdles to get through to make it remotely viable at scale.

For even longer, we've been told that this automation would mean we all work less hours and a myriad of other things that also haven't happened. If anything, we're pushed to work more to be productive and to diversify our income with side hustles and gigs.

Yeah, we need a cultural shift well beyond just raising the minimum wage, but as it stands, the minimum wage is currently basically variable with a portion paid by the government and another portion by employer(s). For some, it's already £15+ an hour if you add their in-work benefits on top of their wage. The question on wages is how much of it should employers vs government be responsible for (whether through the current Tax Credit and UC system, or UBI/UBS system), not just about raising it, as part of that cultural shifting.

Brefugee · 24/08/2022 14:26

You're all still thinking inside the box.
If housing didn't take such a chunk of wages and cause so much stress... if utilities didn't take such a chunk of wages and cause so much stress... if the NHS were properly funded, resourced and used (by the end usefs)... if being a SAHP didn't potentially lead to poverty in case of relationship breakdown...

Tax loopholes should be closed (or tightened then closed), higher earners should pay more tax, corporations should pay (more) tax, windfall profits should be taxed accordingly, pay restraint among CEOs should be a thing,

just talking about an uplift to the NMW in the society we're now in leads to at least 14 pages of partially incoherent bumble

gnilliwdog · 24/08/2022 14:27

takealettermsjones · 24/08/2022 14:19

You really think humans would prefer doing something meaningless 40-70 hours per week for 50 years because it pays the same as saving lives?

Some of those who have already done the latter would, yes. Because the pleasant notion of "saving lives" doesn't mitigate the stress, fear, burnout, compassion fatigue, exhaustion, etc.

Sad. I would have thought they would rather stay in their profession and progress. Well, private cleaners charge up to £18ph so I suppose most of them must be ex healthcare professionals, barristers, teachers who find the job so much more pleasant they are prepared to give up their profession. I do know a few cleaners, by the way, and they are not doing it because they gave up nursing, law or teaching for the good life.

JustALittleHelpPlease · 24/08/2022 14:28

dianthus101 · 24/08/2022 14:19

Of course it would cause a wage spiral. It would not only be the people who are currently on minimum wage who need a wage increase. Anyone currently on less than £15 would need a pay rise. Many on a bit more than £15 would expect a pay rise too or you would get managers receiving the same amount as their staff. Many of those people including those currently on minimum wage are not receiving benefits. Not everyone minimum wage is in in debt. Not everyone in debt is on minimum wage.

Yes sorry I did correct myself in the subsequent post. I meant inflation not wage spiral.

BarryBantam · 24/08/2022 14:28

@beachcitygirl If your staff earn less than £15 an hour they are financially precarious themselves and may well become "vulnerable" (if they have children) this coming winter. They'll already be claiming state benefits themselves as it is.

So, are you really helping?

"In the event of an emergency, secure your own breathing apparatus first."

justasking111 · 24/08/2022 14:29

DS fresh out of university is thrilled to have got a job on 22k per annum. Because he's done the relevant job for the last four years in the holidays he was offered more. The flat hunting however is a nightmare. Rents still rising, properties gone in hours. £800 upwards pcm for one bedroom 🙈

beachcitygirl · 24/08/2022 14:30

@Cyclemarine
Hmm yet another person who worked in a supermarket as a stop FAO commenting.

You knew you had a way out. Not comparable.

Secondly, are you seriously so lacking in empathy that you think supermarket workers don't see their regular customers coming to the fill & having to put food back as not able to afford it, or are people shoplifting baby formula, or see the homeless people outside waiting by the bins for food or worry that if they refuse to go to work at a minutes notice even if their own child is ill or needs them at a weekend or holiday that they will be unemployed in a heartbeat & visiting food banks.

Do you genuinely not recognise the soul crushing degradation of monotonous minimum wage work where you have to ask to go to the loo as well as the very human empathetic issues of worry you describe as being only teachers experiencing.

Or do you just not care.