Something that always strikes me as inefficient about the NHS - and I may have misunderstood how it works - is how prescriptions and investigations requested by a specialist can get sent to the GP to organise.
In Australia, if someone is seen by a specialist and they want investigations, they order them. They prescribe their own medications. They follow up their own investigations.
There’s a few caveats - there are efficient private labs and imaging providers. most will bulk bill (free to the patient) but for a while an MRI brain was “free” if ordered by the GP, but not the specialist, so that investigation was fobbed back to the GP to organise.
it seems like a huge time-waster to have prescriptions/investigations sent back through the GP when they are busy enough.
Similarly, I see posts on here about children having to get bloods done at the hospital, because they are children. Locally, there are 4 main private pathology providers, all with numerous clinics. All of them have experienced phlebotomists who are great with children, even toddlers and babies. AND - the bloods are back and reported within 1-2 days.
I know everyone on MN is averse to anything private but it seems nuts to me that everything has to go to the GP first.
I agree though about people valuing what they pay for. In Australia there’s a system called the NDIS; it funds therapy for children with physical/developmental challenges. Over 6 years there needs to be a “concrete” diagnosis, under 6 there just need to be two or more areas of developmental concern. The therapy is provided by private OT/physio/speech/psychology/any other therapy that is NDIS registered. I was talking to a speech pathologist the other day who provides a mobile service - she said the number of people who forget she’s coming and are out when she visits has risen considerably now that therapy is “free”: