Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

White musicians had Rasta hair and played Reggae music. Concert stopped.

158 replies

Markedforsl · 26/07/2022 20:29

I'm including a translation of an article in a Berlin newspaper, about a concert which took place (or should have taken place) in Switzerland.
A band of white musicians played, among other things, some reggae music. Some of the band had rasta style hair.
Some concert-goers expressed "discomfort" with the situation to the organisers. The organisers stopped the concert and have made abject apologies.

YANBU: White musicians playing reggae music and even wearing dreadlocks while doing so is okay, and doesn't justify the immediate termination of a concert.
YABU: Only Jamaicans should play reggae music and/or have dreadlocks. If white people do either of those things it is racism and should not be allowed. Innocent concert-goers need to be protected from this.

"As reported by several media in Switzerland, the dialect band Lauwarm performed at the Brasserie Lorraine in Bern on 18 July. The five musicians were standing in for another band that had cancelled. The repertoire of the group Lauwarm includes reggae, indie, world and pop. But their colourful programme was not well received - apparently mainly because of the hairstyles. Concertgoers expressed "discomfort with the situation" to the organisers, report Neue Zürcher Zeitung and 20 Minuten.
The concert was stopped after the complaints. In a statement, the organiser now apologised for "awareness gaps". The audience should have been "better protected" before the performance. As the Brasserie Lorraine cooperative announced on Facebook on Monday, the discomfort of the visitors had been related to the topic of "cultural appropriation". That is: the band Lauwarm is criticised for being white musicians, wearing partly rasta haircuts and playing Jamaican reggae music, although they themselves have never experienced the racial exclusion of Jamaicans.
The organisers apologised "to all the people for whom the concert has caused bad feelings". They said they were responsible because they had invited the band. "We failed to deal with it enough in advance and to protect you." The lengthy apology to all those who suffered ends with the words, "Not a millimetre of room for Racism and other discrimination.."

OP posts:
Whoactuallythinksthat · 27/07/2022 16:59

CulturePigeon · 27/07/2022 13:26

I think the world of the arts is really screwed up at the moment. Confusion reigns, and I'm just waiting it out until things settle down.

What is now called 'cultural appropriation' was, just a few years ago, regarded favourably as participating/taking an influence from other cultures. I knew of someone (White British and competitively right-on) who was indignant that some participants in the Chinese NY celebrations in China Town in London were European in appearance. Horrors! How very dare they!

Personally I can't see what's wrong or offensive (a word that's the curse of our times, surely...) about, say, adopting hairstyles and dress of other cultures in a positive way (not to make mock, obviously). it used to be fine, and it used to be looked on as progressive but trends and fashions change.

What about cooking curries/stir fries at home? Is that OK?

In the world of acting there's a view that only gay actors can now play gay characters. But if actors had to have experienced all that their character has experienced...how would that work? They used to do careful research and then basically, act. Yet this view is very strongly held by some people - but my question is, where would that view take us if you follow it to its logical conclusion? It's surely about the nature of acting and performing.

There's a huge and very sensitive controversy about race in the acting profession. A few years ago I enjoyed an all-black RSC Hamlet, and I usually think colour-blind casting works - with one exception: when it deals with a real, historic character such as Anne Boleyn. I couldn't get past that fact that we have a record of what Anne Boleyn looked like, and she wasn't black. I couldn't suspend disbelief for the recent TV series which cast a black actor in that part. You wouldn't want to see a white person playing Dr Martin Luther King - we know what he looked like and his race was crucial in his story.

It's all really confused and contradictory, though. If black actors can play supposedly white (say, Dickens or Jane Austen) characters, which of course they can and do, then should a white actor who's just burning to play Othello be allowed to do so? No? I would probably agree, because race is very relevant in that part, but nevertheless, I think there's a huge amount of confused thinking going on at the moment. I'm hoping someone will clear the muddy waters soon using both common sense and humanity.

Yes, I agree. With regard to actors playing roles, if race is irrelevant to the story, then anyone can play it. Likewise gender…….although trickier. If, however, it’s central, then it would be too distracting eg putting a black man in the role of a white slave owner. It would confuse the story and add a nuance that was not there.
Additionally, if straight men are not allowed to play gay roles, then gay men should not play straight roles…….which is ridiculous and we never would have had the Hot Priest…….!

Ylvamoon · 27/07/2022 17:07

... and this is how you segregate, entice violence and lure people into ignorance.

Faciadipasta · 27/07/2022 17:56

God this kind of shit passes me off. I'm mixed race. 1 white British parent and 1 mixed (black and white) Jamaican parent. I already feel like I don't belong anywhere or in any group. If I refer to being "black" or even "mixed" people generally don't believe me a bc i look sort of southern European, but if i say white im denying my heritage. this just enforces it all the more.

bellac11 · 27/07/2022 18:53

LadyKenya · 27/07/2022 08:29

There is no such thing as "rasta hair". Sorry if you do not think that language is important. But it really is. Using the right terms is important.

Rasta is short for Rastafarian, which if you've spent any time with Rastas you will have heard a lot

Rastafarians nearly always have dreadlocked hair, aka Rasta hair, or Rasta style hair if the person being referred to is not Rastafarian.

Markedforsl · 27/07/2022 23:01

An update from a member of the band - they don't want to be allowed to play only folk music. Plus slave ancestry:
switzerlandtimes.ch/people/unfortunately-our-critics-remained-invisible/

OP posts:
bellac11 · 27/07/2022 23:05

He's right, he might have ancestors who were slaves but even if he didnt, its about what music he wants to create.

And he is also right that the complainers are invisible.

wonderstuff · 27/07/2022 23:15

He’s spot on. You simply can’t assume you know a person’s ancestry by looking at them (im super pale but also have ancestors who were slaves) and of course music can’t be put into culturally distinct categories only to be played by certain people.

turbonerd · 28/07/2022 09:39

And just to add; there were fairly high profile Black slave owners in the US as well.
and there were White slaves, in particular Irish (and some Scottish) indentured labourers.

in the Pacific in the 1850’s I think it was, some had a group of 120-150 sacandinavian slaves, who then mutinated after about 18 months into their 5-10 yr «contract». Due to luck, and luck only, their mutiny was successful.

knowing this does not detract from the horror that was the Atlantic slavetrade. But it shows that it is pointless to police hairstyles and music according to «race».

New posts on this thread. Refresh page