Attendance awards are ableist tosh. All those with the useful defences - ah, my child only ever gets these, ah, well other certificates shouldn't be given then - are hard of thinking.
My child rarely got certificates because she struggled with dyspraxia and dyslexia. But she also didn't get attendance certificates - ever - due to multiple disabilities. And, in fact, she was bullied because of this - her school had the idiotic practice.of handing out prizes to classes with the best attendance, like getting to play on consoles at breaks etc. Her class knew it was her stopping them from getting the perks, and they told her this to her face (one boy beat her up for it, in fact.)
So no. The whole 'only certificate they can get' doesn't float. Schools should employ more imagination and give certificates out for all children, not difficult to find something they actually make effort at, unlike attendance awards which however much the apologists argue are down to sheer luck. Why are schools giving kids awards for being lucky? For not getting sick? For not having feckless parents?
As for the poster saying those who don't get attendance awards due to disability don't get sports awards either, this is also ableist tosh. Disabilities come in all different shapes. My dd did get running awards despite her multiple disabilities and dyspraxia. Because the school recognised her effort.
Those who defend these obviously have no idea what life with a disabled child is like and how the playing field is already unfair for them without them being excluded from something because of their disability. What it's saying to them is, 'you are not enough and never will be, and the people who are enough are the healthy ones.'
Hate the things and relieved my kids aren't at that stage now. I've said this before on here, but I was never more proud of ds when he came home with a 100% attendance award and proceeded to tear it up in front of dd, he was only about 7 and he understood the hurt it caused her.