Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think being able to use housing benefits as a mortgage is unfair?

388 replies

blahloney · 09/06/2022 14:58

I’m actually feeling quite annoyed. I currently work full time, don’t receive benefits but cannot afford to buy a house despite my rent being more than a mortgage. How is this fair?

OP posts:
canyoutoleratethis · 09/06/2022 15:55

Lastqueenofscotland2 · 09/06/2022 15:01

It also as your post demonstrates… just further serves to make people who struggle financially who work against those who struggle financially and don’t work, rather than look at the root cause of the problem, ie rich folk hoarding property and avoiding tax

This.
All. Day. Long. This.

LakieLady · 09/06/2022 15:57

JustTheOneSwan · 09/06/2022 15:13

You can if it's interest only after a certain amount of time of you meet the criteria.

I haven't heard anything to the effect that it's going to help existing homeowners who subsequently end up on benefits. I'd very much appreciate a link to wherever it says that's proposed. (I work in welfare rights and have already had a client ask me about this.)

At the moment, mortgage payers on means-tested benefits can get an element called "support for mortgage interest" added to their UC/ESA/PIP if they wish. But it's only a loan, and the debt to the govt is secured by a charge against the property. It's almost like a mortgage in reverse.

And iirc, the interest on the debt to is around 3.6%, which may be more than people currently pay on their mortgage.

viques · 09/06/2022 15:57

Blossomtoes · 09/06/2022 15:13

It’s never going to happen. It’s yet another attempt to distract from Partygate/the disastrous confidence vote. I dread to think what he’s going to dream up after they lose the two by-elections on the 23rd.

I agree, it’s a typical Boris sound bite for headlines. It’s like the Rwanda hotels for deported asylum seekers, never going to happen, but it shuts up the back benchers and the ranters for a couple of weeks while he thinks up another boys own ripping wheeze.

FourTeaFallOut · 09/06/2022 15:57

lonelyapple · 09/06/2022 15:50

YANBU. I think lots of people will just give up work and go on benefits. I know I will if it is really the case that I can get a free house paid for by housing benefit! Also ridiculous that those on benefits won't be subject to the £16k savings limits while those that aren't on benefits will. What's the point in working harder if you are basically going to be told you need to pay more tax so that someone else, working less or not all all, can be better off than you!

No they won't. Who'd give up the security of work and throw themselves at the mercy of the Tory party during a cost of living crisis when they are being jettisoned from pillar to post like the political football they have become in the hope you might be able to use an undefined amount of housing benefit towards a mortgage the bank won't give you anyway. Meanwhile you can endure your new position in life as a social punchbag for any fucker with a chip on their shoulder.

I'll stick with my job thanks.

ninnynonny · 09/06/2022 15:57

Not sure if it's already been said but housing benefit is paying the mortgage of thousands of private landlords already, why are people suddenly up in arms about this?..

Theresamagicalplace · 09/06/2022 15:57

iCorvidae · 09/06/2022 15:44

You're not wrong!

The world has gone mad - when someone can work 40+ hours at the likes of Tescos (£9.55 an hour, gives an annual salary of £ 19,864)
1 child aged 6 (no childcare or any other money in or out)

Is able to claim £55.35 - HOW ON EARTH can someone working FULL TIME not earn enough to live on???????????????????????????

**

Universal Credit
£55.35 / weekly
We estimate your monthly Universal Credit award will be £239.85.
If you made a claim for Universal Credit today this would be paid into your bank account on 15 July 2022. Our estimate is based on you receiving earnings of £1,273.11 and other income of £0.00 in the period between 09 June 2022 and 08 July 2022 (your assessment period if you claimed today).

I did a quote the other day out of interest to see how my claim would change if I changed jobs. Two people working full time (around 40k per year joint), paying childcare and renting are eligible for UC (and a fairly decent amount too). But hey all claimants are dirty scroungers according to some posters aren't they?! I think a lot of people are unaware of how many people are actually eligible.

Antarcticant · 09/06/2022 15:58

5128gap · 09/06/2022 15:53

I would rather HB went towards paying a mortgage for the claimant, giving someone on a low income the opportunity to acquire an asset, rather than pay the mortgage of a buy to let landlord.

Yes (as a mortgage payer who has never received HB) I agree with this.

TwinklingFairyLights · 09/06/2022 16:01

RewildingAmbridge · 09/06/2022 15:54

I admit I haven't read the full details but I assumed this was almost for the opposite, so if someone owns a house and loses their job, they currently can't claim housing benefit which means people lose their homes and then end up on housing benefit in rented which is more expensive than the mortgage they lost.

It doesn't mean this though. Lenders have extended a high amount of forbearance to mortgage holders. This forbearance has made commercial sense to lenders due to increasing house prices ie the mortgage holder may have been on a payment holiday but the property was increasing by x amount a year. The question is, if house prices start to drop, are lenders going to extend the same level of forbearance to those who are in negative equity? I know my old Nationwide mortgage terms said that they couldn't start repossession proceedings until I had less than 10% equity in the property. This isn't an issue in an era of rising house prices because mortgage holders start to gain more equity as soon as they move in. It's a completely different story if house prices start to drop.

the80sweregreat · 09/06/2022 16:02

I thought that buy to let owners did pay a lot of tax? I remember a similar thread once a while back and a btl landlord / woman on here was listing his tax affairs etc. it wasn't all wonderful and seemed genuine. They are not all land owning tories ( although many are ) and they have to pay all the maintenance too. That's a shock as a 'home owner ' paying for that yourself and not cheap!
Anyways, maybe the banks won't play ball here and the stress testing will throw up too many problems even with a big discount towards the mortgage etc. interest rates will go up too :(
It is very fragile for many.

TwinklingFairyLights · 09/06/2022 16:02

ninnynonny · 09/06/2022 15:57

Not sure if it's already been said but housing benefit is paying the mortgage of thousands of private landlords already, why are people suddenly up in arms about this?..

I know and it's appalling.

lonelyapple · 09/06/2022 16:02

Nothappyatwork · 09/06/2022 15:52

Do you think they’re gonna let you just give up your job and jump onto benefits 🤣
you will be sanctioned at every move if you are signing on as bodied person who hasn’t got a job, you will be required to spend 40 hours a week producing a diary documenting what you have done to find a job. So nobody will be throwing in the towel and going to live the viva Loca on benefits

I'll just find a low paid job and work the minimum amount of hours to quality for UC and not be hassled. Loads around here.

MountainClimber22 · 09/06/2022 16:03

Housing benefit can't be used to pay for a mortgage what you on about.

TwinklingFairyLights · 09/06/2022 16:03

MountainClimber22 · 09/06/2022 16:03

Housing benefit can't be used to pay for a mortgage what you on about.

Read the news.

Samcro · 09/06/2022 16:04

JustTheOneSwan · 09/06/2022 15:03

It's bollocks just to cause a row and set people against each other.
If you get HB or UC you aren't allowed savings over £16,000.
You've no way to get a deposit.
don't fall for propaganda.

this

MountainClimber22 · 09/06/2022 16:05

People can have savings but they will get less benefits as they take the savings into account.

Theresamagicalplace · 09/06/2022 16:05

lonelyapple · 09/06/2022 16:02

I'll just find a low paid job and work the minimum amount of hours to quality for UC and not be hassled. Loads around here.

If you have no children or children over a certain age the minimum hours to work is 35 a week. You won't be better off trust me

TwinklingFairyLights · 09/06/2022 16:06

MountainClimber22 · 09/06/2022 16:05

People can have savings but they will get less benefits as they take the savings into account.

Not if the deposit savings are ring fenced, as per the news today.

Nothappyatwork · 09/06/2022 16:07

lonelyapple · 09/06/2022 16:02

I'll just find a low paid job and work the minimum amount of hours to quality for UC and not be hassled. Loads around here.

Yeah I’m sure that will keep you warm in your old age, honestly it just makes me laugh out loud. I pay 40% tax on everything I earn over and above the threshold and it’s still worth my while dragging my arse to work every day to just not to be on minimum wage and having to deal with anybody at the universal credits department.

I believe me there’s been times I’ve considered it. But I would do it in addition to self employment and no way would I rely on the government to keep the roof over the children and i’s heads.

I have seen the shit they put people through, literally calling my friend who works full time by the way and had small children, at work to tell her that she needed to get in to an appointment with them with less than 24 hours notice otherwise she would be sanctioned. Literally the list of reasons they could sanction you just seemed to be endless.

catandcoffee · 09/06/2022 16:08

Maybe I am being synical, but is this to divide the country. 🤔

Regularsizedrudy · 09/06/2022 16:08

Attractinglife · 09/06/2022 15:03

Its a terrible policy. Part of the reason we have such an awful housing crisis is the near destruction of the social rented market through the RTB of council homes. Council housing used to be respectable and aspirational. Even if the conservatives did build one new HA property for each sold off (and I don't believe it) there will still not be enough affordable social housing. We need to massively increase social rented housing, improve the private rented sector through developing a proper professionally run private rented sector, where tenants have security of tenure and decent rights. Part of the reason everyone wants to buy (which has pushed up house prices to unaffordable levels) is there is not a decent, affordable, accessible alternative to owning your own home in this country.

Hear hear!

MountainClimber22 · 09/06/2022 16:09

TwinklingFairyLights · 09/06/2022 16:03

Read the news.

Newspapers are never accurate I've read so much rubbish about benefits in the past. Has anything been confirmed? I've not heard if it has.

the80sweregreat · 09/06/2022 16:09

catandcoffee · 09/06/2022 16:08

Maybe I am being synical, but is this to divide the country. 🤔

Yep, it's working already

Nothappyatwork · 09/06/2022 16:10

Regularsizedrudy · 09/06/2022 16:08

Hear hear!

People who are up to their eyeballs in debt are compliant.

that’s the plan, right now we have far too many people who do not need to work, who are in a comfortable position without a PAYE income.
The plan is to get those people back into the workforce by pushing up the retirement age, by inflating away their savings and by forcing as many people as possible to be indebted for as long as possible.

Blossomtoes · 09/06/2022 16:10

I thought that buy to let owners did pay a lot of tax?

They pay tax at the same rate as the rest of us. They sob about being hard done by but they’re really not.

Soontobe60 · 09/06/2022 16:12

blahloney · 09/06/2022 15:07

I also didn’t realise you could have £16,000 savings and still claim UC and Housing Benefits. The world’s gone mad.

I agree - in fact, anyone who has the cheek to claim any sort of means tested benefits should prove they’re homeless, starving and at deaths door before their claim can be processed!

Swipe left for the next trending thread