I think - as is usual on threads about cooking from scratch - a lot of posters are missing the point here.
I haven't read the full thread, but I have read up to page 4, and the usual things are being trotted out:
Bought stuff is:
- Not as healthy
- Not as tasty
- Not as good quality
That's not what the OP said. She said it was
cheaper to buy than cook from scratch, and I think, in general, she is right.
We're not talking about whether a Charlie Bingham fish pie is more expensive than your own deluxe fish pie with king prawns, monkfish tails and salmon (it probably is), we're talking about - I think OP? - day-to-day items that fill up your family when cash is in short supply.
Every thread about saving money always features someone airily saying make homemade cakes and bread because they are cheaper. A loaf of bread can be bought for 65p and a box of mini rolls for £1.30. I don't think you could produce a loaf of bread or a cake that cheaply. I know homemade is better etc etc etc but in absolute terms, the bought item is cheaper than the homemade equivalent.
To take an example on this thread: 'Making tomato sauce is always cheaper than buying it' and 'Making your own pasta sauce with a tin of tomatoes an onion some garlic and dried herbs is cheaper than the equivalent jar, surely?'
Bought: Tesco Chunky Vegetable Pasta Sauce 500g 70p
Homemade:
Tin of tomatoes (cheapest) : 28p
Half a red pepper @ 48p = 24p
Half a courgette @ 40p = 20p
Half a yellow pepper @ 48p = 24p
= 96p, without adding olive oil, tomato puree, garlic or herbs and without factoring in the cost to cook it, not just heat it up.
I think there is a tendency to completely underestimate the cost of home cooking, but if you do the costings (which I have from time to time) you will get a nasty shock, I guarantee.