He might give it to our three year old who'd already had a piece?
We're in the supermarket and on the way past the fruit and veg the two dd's each had a piece of fruit that was being given out as a sample from a stall.
At the end of our trip when we were back at the fruit and veg our 3 year old wanted another piece so we asked and were told "No only one sample per customer and you've already been" Fair enough that is their policy and neither dh or I have a problem with that.
So dh mentions to the lady, the same lady who gave the girls the sample earlier that since he hadn't had a sample earlier so could he please have a piece now and she said No because we'd already been.
I pointed out that yes we'd been but Dh and I hadn't taken samples so technically we could still have a piece and she said and I quote "Yes that's correct but you're not getting a piece because you'll give it to your dd and she's already had a piece."
Is that not just a little bit ridiculous? Surely if dh is given a sample and he decides to give it to his dd or share it with her it's up to him?
Isn't it just a bit jobsworthy to be so pedantic about something as small as a piece of fruit?
Am I unreasonable to be annoyed by this?