It’s pointless trying to break through to the none Home Educators here.
It's pointless trying to break through to the non-home educated here.
most of them can’t think outside of their ‘send kids to school obey conformity’ mindset.
Um, I literally used to work for an Home Education organisation and was in contact with Home Educators every single day. If I had a child (or hopefully when I have children) I would definitely either home educate or send them to a forest school. But sure knock yourself out about how super duper special and non-conformist you are and how everyone else is a dumb robot.
as long as THEIR civil liberties aren’t affected
I already have an enhanced DBS that is regularly updated. I'm not asking for anything that I don't already do personally.
would happily have us and our children all microchipped and our homes installed with live CCTV for ‘safeguarding’.
What do you hope to gain from making up this kind of hyperbole? Why are you trying to undermine the concept of safeguarding by conflating it with what sounds worryingly similar to Q-Anon style conspiracy theories about government monitoring?
They have no interest in our lived experiences
You clearly have no interest in my "lived experience" as the only person (or at least the only one who's mentioned it) on this thread who actually was deregistered from school as a child.
I kind of think spite comes into it a bit also.
Accusing child abuse survivors of being "spiteful" for wanting to prevent other kids from being abused is probably the most spiteful thing I've ever read here.
I don't even have children. My ONLY concern is protecting other abused home ed kids like me.