Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think a week's suspension isn't enough for this ?

61 replies

milkyway100 · 11/05/2022 18:40

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10805247/Doctor-43-unlawfully-accessed-pregnant-ex-girlfriends-medical-records.html

OP posts:
farmerboy · 12/05/2022 10:03

Final written warning would be more appropriate

ChiefWiggumsBoy · 12/05/2022 10:08

CompostMaker · 11/05/2022 18:53

Was it his baby? If it was then I completely understand why he would want to look at the ultrasound. I think it was too harsh - he should have perhaps been spoken too by a supervisor. He hasn’t really done anything terrible, just looked at some ultrasound pictures and test results.

I can understand him wanting to look, but actually doing it? No.

If ‘because it’s his baby’ is a justification for this then it’s a slippery slide to ‘unless both parents agree an abortion can’t be had’. A woman’s body is her own and this is despicable behaviour. He should have been sacked at the least and would have been I reckon had it not been because of a pregnancy.

gothereagain · 12/05/2022 10:11

Disgusting behaviour. Final written warning and probation at the very least. That's what happened to a nurse I worked with who looked up a celebrities details. Admittedly she was possibly planning to sell the info however I almost think doing it to your own family is worse!

PutinIsAWarCriminal · 12/05/2022 10:22

His baby but more importantly her body. I don't believe he should have been sacked, it isn't as though we have an abundance of doctors, but there do still need to be stronger repercussions then just a week off work.
I wonder though how many people in privileged positions do this, council workers, HR staff, police, all have access to records of people they know. I bet sneaking a peak, however awful, isn't as uncommon as we like to think.

DifficultBloodyWoman · 12/05/2022 10:25

I wonder if this could be used by the woman in question in a private prosecution?

I suspect that there might be a back story here as well and this might form a pattern of behaviour.

crashingagainandagain · 12/05/2022 10:33

A week’s suspension seems like a joke… !

I would have hated this. Wouldn’t want to be treated by him either!

Brefugee · 12/05/2022 12:20

So you think he should not only lose his job, but he barred from practicing medicine the rest of his life? You’re one of those no second chances type of people aren’t you.

No I'm not. But what he did isn't a bagatelle. It is huge. You can be struck off for a year or so. Just to drive a point home.

By the way your French is wrong you said “for encouraging the others” when I think you mean to discourage or deter others, which is pour dissuader les autres.

My French is fine, thanks. It's a quote by Voltaire, and it does what it says on the tin. It is used all the time in writing to mean "setting an example". Oh wait - are you the radiologist?

Discovereads · 12/05/2022 13:31

It's a quote by Voltaire, and it does what it says on the tin. It is used all the time in writing to mean "setting an example"

But there’s a nuance to the phrase as to what sort of example is being set. This phrase means setting an example by punishing someone who didn’t do enough, not setting an example by punishing someone who did something wrong/committed a crime. Have a second look at the context, you’ll see.

WorriedMumofTeen16 · 12/05/2022 13:37

ODFOx · 12/05/2022 08:57

There was a story in the news in the last week about a woman (a ward manager I think) who was sacked for looking up the ward number of her son's ex and popping in to say congratulations and give her new baby a toy.
Looking up someone's details is totally forbidden. There should be no exceptions.

She then went on to manage to get a GP reception job, whether she's kept it since this has hit the press I'm unsure

WorriedMumofTeen16 · 12/05/2022 13:40

TabithaTittlemouse · 11/05/2022 19:20

She is not his patient. He knew it was wrong.

One of my family members was referred to my team. I made it clear to the team that I was not to be involved in their care, excused myself from meetings where they were discussed and although I could easily have accessed their records the thought never crossed my mind.

When I was 15 part of my work was in the histocytology lab, mounting samples on slides. One came through with my aunt's name and it roughly matched her age. May have been her or may not but I alerted work experience supervisor and that one wasn't mounted by me. I knew it wouldn't be right for me to do that slide at 15 so he damn well knew what he was doing was far worse

WorriedMumofTeen16 · 12/05/2022 13:41

Sorry, work experience at 15

New posts on this thread. Refresh page