I live in an area where the Labour council has done a good job over the last few years and I would normally automatically vote for the local Labour council candidate. But Labour's stance on women and a couple of other issues worries me and I have no idea what any of them actually believe in. There have been no leaflets, no hustings are being held and I've realised that actually, this really matters to me. I can't control what's going on in the Ukraine or Afghanistan, but perhaps I can make an informed decision about my local area.
I decided to ask a few questions of all the candidates standing in my ward, so I started searching for contact details (the election's just a month away) and all I could find was postal (snail mail) addresses. I called the council to ask for email addresses and someone there confirmed that snail mail was the only way of contacting them. I know that the guy who is acting as agent for the local Labour candidate disagrees with me on several big issues. He's hard left. I'm older, feminist and more centrist and he's made his dislike and disapproval of me very clear on several occasions. I think my chances of the candidate ever getting to see a paper letter I'd sent would be very slim. I'm pretty sure he'd mislay it, as he has other communications.
My guess is that finding paper and and envelopes, trying to handwrite after years of typing and then investing 68p in a second class stamp is designed to deter people from contacting candidates. This isn't democratic, is it? When you can do so many other things on line, how come you can't email candidates in what may be a crucial election? The council says they are required to do this and it's the electoral authority that insists on it. Surely this needs to be updated for the 21st century?