My MIL is a retired nurse. Last week she phoned her GP and said that she was concerned that she was suffering from a subarachnoid haemorrhage (a bleed on the brain caused by a burst blood vessel). She had a headache, stiff neck and nausea. She has a family history of this problem as it caused her mother's death.
Her GP said that he would not call an ambulance for her as they would be likely to be too busy but that she should drive herself to the hospital and go to A&E for a scan. MIL fortunately took a taxi to A&E, where she was assessed as having a muscle spasm in her neck, which was causing the headache. There was no bleed on her brain.
It seems utterly alarming that a GP would advise someone suspected of having an active bleed on the brain to get in a car and drive. I'm considering contacting the practice manager and raising this as a concern for investigation.
On the other hand, what I suspect but cannot prove is that the GP has diagnosed MIL as having nothing more than health anxiety and thought that although there was no realistic likelihood of her suffering from a haemorrhage at that time that it was the only way to resolve her anxiety.
But if I'm wrong about that, then should I take it at face value and raise a concern?