I'm inheriting a substantial sum from the sale of my mum's house. I want to use the money to help our children (currently aged 18 and 15) onto the housing ladder at an appropriate time. Some ideas I had are:
- Buy a rental property in my name, mortgage free, and rent it out. (Pro: Hedge against inflation. Con: tax, fees, hassle).
- Ditto, but buy the property via a trust in our sons' names, so I am effectively gifting the money to them now. (Pro: Hedge against future inheritance tax and rental income tax).
- Ditto, but buy property in location where DS1 can live during uni (Pro: Will reduce uni expenses and capital gains tax)
- Invest the money until the DC's need it. (Pro: Liquidity, growth prospects. Con: Risk of losing money).
I consulted with a financial adviser recommended by a friend. He very quickly dismissed options 1-3 and homed in on option 4 on the grounds that over time investments tend to rise above inflation. I get that in principle, but they can obviously go down as well as up. This adviser claims to be independent, but is nevertheless recommending the funds offered by his own company (for which he will receive a commission), which rings an alarm bell. Am I being too cautious? I know that none of you can tell me whether or not to trust this person or the organisation they work for, but my question is ... how does anyone ever trust any financial adviser? If you use a financial adviser, how did you go about vetting them in the first place? I know the website 'Unbiased.com' is widely recommended for finding independent advisors, but independence still doesn't guarantee that the advice is any good.