[quote whysonasty]@MsAgnesDiPesto Again, how do you draw conclusions on my “view” based on one post?
I’d love to work in a place where there’s no hierarchy. If I ever come across one I’ll be first to apply. The two roles I mention clearly have people in senior roles and have been given the appropriate title. One of the roles is newly created and the lead interviewer admitted she didn’t even know what to call it.
Are you suggesting I’m being precious by questioning things if I do a particular job, bringing a particular amount of experience and qualifications with me yet am downgraded to some obscure, meaningless title…? This has happened to me before and set the standard for opportunities within the company.
Is the onus not on women to push for recognition in what remains largely a man’s world? Not be belittled for doing so?[/quote]
I suggest that a less spiky attitude all round might help in your finding a workplace where you can flourish.
You’ll see if you read my whole post that I only say this applies if your salary would still reflect the work and responsibility.
Focussing on titles rather than contribution does indicate you value status over results. Thinking it was appropriate to raise it at interview before you even know about the culture of the place shows how much it matters to you.
I’ve been recruiting in my field for 20 years and have mentored lots of early career professionals into great roles. I am on the committee of the Equality group in my current workplace and we have no problems here with paying women what they are worth. Of course you should be treated, and paid, commensurately with your experience and your contribution. But raising it early on shows a focus on titles which might be out of step with their culture. Interviews are as much for you as them, which is why I suggested asking careful questions to ensure it’s a good fit.