It's probably a very straightforward answer but I am not thinking straight tonight and the nurse has confused me, though that could be because I have had very little sleep in the past week or because I am exceptionally thick.
My Dm was started on a new medication 2 weeks ago while in hospital and she seemed to react badly to it so they had to take her off it. The medication sent her blood pressure and pulse very high. It settled down when they took her off the medication the next day. I think her blood pressure was 149/90 and her heart rate or pulse was 140 at its highest. They waited until they were sure those measurements were normal before discharging her. They specifically wanted the pulse rate under 100.
This afternoon we had to bring her to A&E again as she seemed very faint and unwell. This time her blood pressure was normal but her pulse rate was 117. Having been examined, and blood tests taken they have sent her home.
I asked the nurse was it ok to send her home when her pulse (or heart rate or whatever it should be called) was very high. The nurse said that it wasn't very high at all. I said that they wouldn't let her home 2 weeks ago until it fell below 100, so why were they sending her home now when it is 117. The nurse said that it was an issue the first time as it was due to medication, but that it's not an issue now as it has nothing to do with medication. I tried very badly to ask why it could be dangerous 2 weeks ago and not dangerous now. She just kept telling me that it's not that high.
I am trying really hard to understand this. I don't have any medical knowledge so I am probably just not grasping something simple. What I can't understand is why her pulse had to be below 100 to be discharged 2 weeks ago but today it was 117 and she was not admitted at all.
I'm trying to see how the high heart rate is a problem one week but not the next. Could somebody explain it to me? I would have thought that it's an indication of something (the pulse rate). I suppose I'm thinking about it as a symptom rather than a thing. Gosh I can't even try to explain why it seems to me to be the same thing.
To me, it's a value, so it either is or is not a concern. But in trying to understand the nurse, I think she was sort of saying that the cause of it is the important thing. Maybe like if you have a really bad headache and it is caused by dehydration and the next week you have a really bad headache but this time it is caused by something serious like a brain hemorrhage or something.
They don't know why her heart rate is so high again but I really don't understand why it's not an issue this week when it was 2 weeks ago?
I have no idea whether I'm even making sense right now as the nurse got frustrated with me earlier because I just couldn't understand her explanation of a high pulse not being an issue when caused by one thing, but it's an issue when it's caused by a different thing.
LOL. I'm not even making sense to myself right now so if anyone can understand what I'm asking I would be grateful.