Can anyone explain the legal difference between this man mocking Captain Tom's death and Giles Coren saying he wished a fellow journalist, Dawn Foster, would burn in hell when she died at the age of 33?
Giles Coren seems to have suffered no professional or personal consequences whatsoever and has made no public apology for or acknowledgement of what he did, whereas this guy was charged and is being prosecuted. Why is that?
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9273781/amp/Pictured-Celtic-fan-35-charged-offensive-tweet-Captain-Tom-Moore.html
www.thenational.scot/news/19457975.giles-coren-slammed-sickening-comment-death-journalist-dawn-foster/
Joseph Kelly, from Glasgow, was charged under the Communications Act 2003, which outlaws "grossly offensive" messages, but why wasn't Giles Coren? Is it because Captain Tom attained national treasure status and captured the nation's hearts during the pandemic, whereas Dawn Foster isn't really known? Can any lawyers shed any light on this?