Hi,
Just wondering about your opinions on this.
I got made redundant and I have 2 school aged dc and a dh at work, I was then was offered a part time job that I really wanted, minimum wage but I was just so glad to be back in work. On the phonecall after I had got offered the job the manager threw in that i could start at 9am rather than 8am aslong as I am happy to cover the other girls annual leave who would also be working the other part time shift,I had already said yes to the job and was excited so was slightly taken aback and said yes as it was thrown in last minute but then went on to be stated in my contract that we would both cover unless good reason not to.
We were working half a day each everyday and then recently changed to full days so I do 2 full days and she does 3 then we do 2 Saturdays each a month. Last year I covered all her annual leave and ended up working 3 saturdays a month for 3 months in a row aswel as every week day until 1pm until we changed to full days.
What I feel dont make sense is if theres the week off from school for example then I book my 2 days off she will need to cover them,then just say in the same week she wants to then book her 3 days off I would have to cover her,so I get 2 days off to then work 3. It doesn't make sense. We do get paid over time for holiday covered. I am just not comfortable looking to next year at having to cover full time what with having children and childcare. Of course the company think it's a great idea but aren't we just cancelling out eachothers holidays? Do I have any leg to stand on to approach work about this. Thoughts please?
Part of me thinks iabu so I am ready to be told either way.