I had cervical cancer 10 years ago. I had an op that removed the cancer but left my womb and reproductive system otherwise intact. I'm in my early 40s now. I've never had a recurrence or anything more than one instance (a couple of years ago) of low grade cell changes that any woman might have.
At my last checkup I had a colposcopy to check things over. This wasn't the plan, I was supposed to have a smear, but the doctor I saw (who I've seen before and tbh wasn't keen on his manner) decided to do the colp. I am not keen on them, because they are a bit grim and also have bad memories of the one that found the cancer. So I freely admit I was a bit teary when he suggested we do it when I wasn't expecting it. He saw something that he wanted to check out and so took a biopsy. This hurt, really hurt, which it never has before, and I said 'Ow' (admittedly loudly) when he did it. This made him very uncomfortable at the time (both I think my distress beforehand and my reaction to the biopsy).
He rang today to say both biopsy and smear were completely clear, no cell changes, no HPV. He doesn't want to discharge me, which is fine, so suggested yearly colps for the next couple of years. I was about to agree to this (as cheerfully as anyone would), when he then said 'Or we could do a hysterectomy'.
I was (and remain) baffled by the suggestion. I asked if there was any clinical indication to do it and he said 'No, but it would save you from coming up to have the appointments and I did think you found the last one difficult'.
TBF, I did, but I am entirely unconvinced that the correct medical treatment for nervousness and discomfort is the complete removal of my womb and all the potential issues that might cause.
He didn't massively press me on it, but it just seems such a left field suggestion - to even bring it up - partly because I feel like he's suggesting my reactions at the last appt were enough to warrant such a measure and because now I am thinking 'Oh I've refused this treatment, what if something could be wrong, even if no indication of that, and I refused this, how bad will I feel if something happens'.
I'll be honest, I've never liked his way of dealing with me (I've seen him once before and had a couple of follow up calls with him), in contrast to everyone else in the dept and at the hospital who are all fucking brilliant, but I am really quite upset at the suggestion of an operation with all its risks (even if small) and potential post-op issues because I got upset.
Full disclosure, I feel like this is a somewhat female issue too - like I was too uncomfortably hysterical (using that advisedly given the context) so he's chosen to suggest something that would stop him having to deal with what made him uncomfortable at my last appt. I am partly basing that on him telling me that 'the biopsy shouldn't hurt', which made me feel like it was my fault for feeling the thing I felt.
Sorry, essay because I am trying to not drip feed. I don't want to complain exactly, but I feel like I want to talk to someone else, and try and understand exactly what the thinking is here and maybe ask if I can possibly no longer see this specific doctor because, frankly, he has made me feel awful and really, I don't know, uncomfortable and wrong, twice now. On the flip side, maybe I am being unreasonable, this is an excellent hospital and a world leading treatment team and everyone else has always been brilliant.
So AIBU to think about making a fuss about a specific doctor when I maybe should just be grateful I am getting the standard of health care I am getting?