My parents spotted a theatre show which would benefit my son (who has special needs) as he is due to study it for his GCSE's and suggested we book it. Good call. It's in half term when I have to send my son to the other grandparents for childcare as it's the only time I can tell work i'm available for shifts. They live just over an hour away. My son doesn't want to go with just them (he thinks they can be a bit mean at times) he wants to go but only if I come with him.
After a bit of discussion it we decided on a date to book and that i'll just have to arrange work around it. My mum has just booked the tickets telling me it's £33.00 for the adult tickets, £16 for a child with special needs, and £16 for the carer of the child. They have offered to pay for my son which is great, but when I asked them how much I would owe them for my ticket they said they would need to think about it. In the heat of the moment I said i'd rather just pay £33 for my ticket rather than nit picking over prices (as i'm not tight with money and I know they can be a bit controlling over money issues and thought they can't argue with that as they can't use it against me). My mum snapped my hand off and agreed straight away without having to think about it.
But thinking about it afterwards I'm just wondering if i've done the right thing? If i'd taken my son on my own it would have cost me a pound less. (which isn't a big deal) but now I feel they are using my son's concession rate and technically profiting from it. Why was it so hard for them to say to me that I should only owe them £16 as i'm my son's main carer. I hope i've explained this properly but something doesn't sit right with me about it. AIBU?