@IntermittentParps
Is it not just because those are the competition disciplines?
That's a bit of a circular argument. We don't offer it for women because women don't do it in competition – well, women won't ever do it in competition if training isn't offered, will they?
I'm interested to know – can women simply not do rings, pommel etc because of strength differences? Or is it just that the standard would be 'lower' (or different) if women did it? If the latter, it doesn't matter if women compete against women.
Womens has 4 apparatus, 3 are lower body focused (vault, floor, and beam), 1 of which is focused (uneven bars)
Mens has 6 apparatus, 2 are lower body focused (vault, and floor), 4 are upper body focused (parallel bars, high bar, pommel horse, rings)
So you can see if the mens disciplines were included into women's it would change the sport massively as the focus would be on building huge amounts of upper body strength to perform high level routines on all those extra upper body apparatus. I'm sure athletes would be able to do routines with the right training but I expect it would take a long time to see it come through it routines that are actually world class.
As a PP mentioned the Rings guys have super extreme bodies as it is so strength focused they are often the oldest gymnasts as it takes a long time to build that strength, the best rings workers also aren't typically good on other pieces since their body type doesn't work for them, even within mens (e.g. their shoulders are so big they can't do pommels properly as they can't reach behind to grab the handles).
Worth noting even the two 'same' apparatus are different.
- In women's the vault it 10cm lower, and the the difficult scores for the equivalent vault is typically higher, the idea being that men find it easier to perform vaults with more twists/rotations.
-In floor men don't have music, dance, and choreography requirements (which I would personally love).