No right or wrong answer. It depends on what realistic hopes their are and you have for your child's future.
Mine and their then peers are all in their twenties now. They were all very visibly not neurotypical and all failing to cope in school. (or shopping, friendships etc)
In all cases schools and LEA's said educate and cater to disabilities, rather than abilities. Some of us disagreed and went our own way. In our case coming out of school and home educating.
Those who went for trying to fit them to the lives we hoped they'd live, and working on their abilities, have had huge battles, and our children have had challenging childhoods, which has been painful for all, but are now all almost independent or semi independent working towards independent, young people in work and not in the benefit system even through Covid.
Those who went for the disability model and distract and avoid have young people who had much better kinder, less challenging childhoods, but are still pretty much the same just larger, and remain dependent on parents, or care, and PIP and ESA decisions. They're not considered responsible, until ATOS or Capita decides they should be, at which point life crashes down.
Some who assumed assisted living placements would be provided, are facing really difficult situations after being told that the system's changed and they'll have to cope long term with frustrated adults who get aggressive and are settled in their ways and expectations.
Of course lots of people like to say all the intervention or non intervention was immaterial and they'd have all ended up where they are now regardless.
DD on the other hand (not ASD) didn't have a possibility of developing into an independent adult at any level, and will always need looking after. So whatever made life simple and as unchallenging for all as possible was the right thing for her.