@JamesMiddletonsMarshmallows
So I don't really get your point
My point was to ask if people thought this was right. I didn't suggest an alternative
Do you mean 'right' as it following the correct guidelines, or 'right' in the sense of 'should they be allowed to do this and is it right for parents to allow their children in alone?'
It sounds like they are following the correct guidelines. And chances are that they will have put measures into place in the time they've been closed, like extra training, smaller numbers, more supervision, perhaps more structure in the sessions, who knows. I don't think anyone could really say how good the supervision will be now until it's started.
In terms of should they be allowed, or should anyone leave their children, well I think that's individual. You don't feel comfortable, which is fine. Many other parents of 4 year olds won't be comfortable either. But older children might be quite happy being left. So it seems sensible for parents to be able to make their own decisions and use their judgement about their children. If they had an age cut-off of 9 year olds or whatever, you'd get some parents of 8 year olds complaining that it wasn't fair.
You don't think it should be allowed, but the only alternative for them is not opening at all. They can't allow parents in. And though you say you haven't suggested an alternative or haven't suggested they shouldn't open, that basically is the only other possibilities, so it's kind of a roundabout way of doing so.
I'm sure they are relying on people who feel comfortable with the set up choosing to use it, and those who don't, waiting until parents are allowed back, which sounds fine to me.
I think it would be a different thread if you asked 'Would you be comfortable leaving a 4/5/6 year old in this situation?' or 'At what age do you think you'd be able to leave your child safely in this situation?' or 'How do you judge whether your child is mature enough to cope with this set-up?'