Moved house last year and the whole place needs renovating. Garden is being done next year but DH and I agreed to do some improvements to make it more usable for the kids this summer. We were originally looking at garden furniture but at the weekend we decided it would be better to get a small bistro set with two chairs and a bench for us all to use as we don’t really host that often and we’ll get the bigger stuff once the garden is complete. We both spent time at the weekend looking but didn’t find anything we both liked.
Today it dawns on me that we have a lot of barbecues just us four and it wouldn’t really work sitting down to eat with that furniture. I mentioned it to DH and he asked what my solution was.
I explained that I didn’t know yet but I thought I should say something so he didn’t keep looking unnecessarily.
This turned into a huge row about how unreasonable I am for not having a solution. I asked if I was just meant to keep this to myself until such time that I do have a solution and apparently I am. It came out in the row that he doesn’t see why it’s a problem, the kids can sit on the floor apparently.
This isn’t the first time we’ve had this row. It’s a different topic each time but the format of the argument is always the same. If I dare to criticise something without an alternative solution he doesn’t like it.
I suspect a lot of people will say it sounds like I criticise all the time but honestly it could be something as simple as I ask him what he would like for dinner tonight. He could suggest burgers and then I raise oh we don’t have any buns. He would then respond with in a tone “well what do you want?”
So was I being unreasonable for raising a flaw in the plan of what garden furniture we were considering buying without having an alternative solution ready?